Georgia recently passed legislation prohibiting migrant workers from working the field. The result? Crops rotting on the vine, and an imperiled state economy.
Jay Bookman’s recent AJC column about Georgia’s new anti-immigration policy illustrates how rash legislation targeting migrant workers can poison state economies.
As you may remember, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal last month signed House Bill 87, a law designed to drive undocumented workers out of Georgia. The bill, which created a new criminal offense of aggravated identity fraud for anyone willfully using phony documents to get a job, had the intended effect: migrant workers were run out of towns across the Peach State.
Now, unsurprisingly, Georgia is facing some unintended — and dire — consequences.
According to Bookman, the new labor shortage has forced Georgia’s farmers to leave “millions of dollars’ worth of blueberries, onions, melons and other crops unharvested and rotting in the fields.” A new survey ordered by Deal found that Georgia’s farmers are at least 11,000 workers short, a problem he tried to medicate by offering 2,000 unemployed criminal probationers for hire.
As Bookman pointed out, even if all 2,000 probationers agreed to work at $8 per hour with no benefits, the problem would be nowhere near fixed. In Bookman’s words:
“It’s hard to envision a way out of this. Georgia farmers could try to solve the manpower shortage by offering higher wages, but that would create an entirely different set of problems. If they raise wages by a third to a half, which is probably what it would take, they would drive up their operating costs and put themselves at a severe price disadvantage against competitors in states without such tough immigration laws. That’s one of the major disadvantages of trying to implement immigration reform state by state, rather than all at once.
The pain this is causing is real. People are going to lose their crops, and in some cases their farms. The small-town businesses that supply those farms with goods and services are going to suffer as well. For economically embattled rural Georgia, this could be a major blow.”
Georgia’s situation, besides being sad, exposes the complexity of America’s illegal immigration problem. The residents of South Park summed it up with, “DEY TOOK YER JOBS!”
Sure, but dey also made yer fruit affordable and yer produce competitive in the national economy.
According to a Washington Post article, the unemployed probationers are not exactly thriving in their new jobs.
Hopefully, this will be a lesson to other states considering similar bills. When lawmakers pass rash, simplistic measures to solve a problem as complex as immigration, they risk destroying their state’s economy.





June 23, 2011 at 8:21 pm, Masha said:
I though once Georgia got rid of all undocumented residents there should be no more unemployment, and Georgia should be a paradise on Earth. Hey, unemployed people it is time to work, stop all the unemployment benefits in Georgia. They have plenty of jobs.
June 24, 2011 at 2:42 am, wigglwagon said:
Why are you in such a hurry for unemployed people to bail out those farmers? At least wait until they bring the wages up a little. Right now, most of them are only offering the same thing they paid the illegal aliens. There is a legal guest worker program already in place but the farmers are too greedy to even pay the modest wages of that program. Let supply and demand determiine the pay just as it does in most industries.
June 24, 2011 at 7:53 am, Sarajo said:
uhhhh…waiting might be ok, except the crops won’t wait…they’re already rotting. And, those”greedy” farmers are barely making it as is. As the article points out, they can offer higher wages, but will not be competitive with neigboring states who still have migrant workers. It was short-sighted of the legislature to pass a law before considering all of the consequences.
June 24, 2011 at 1:07 pm, wigglwagon said:
The farmers are the ones letting it rot. They could offer fair wages immediately but they choose to not do that. They would rather let it rot in hopes of getting the politicians to rescind the law. The only short sightedness was on the part of the farmers. They never should have switched from legal resident workers to illegal aliens in the first place. They should not have thumbed their nose at the law. They made their bed. Let them lie in it.
“As the article points out, they can offer higher wages, but will not be competitive with neigboring states who still have migrant workers.”
Tell that to people who do not know anything about produce. Georgia crops come in after Florida, not at the same time. South Carolina and Alabama are following suit on the law. They do not grow good Vidalias anywhere but Georgia. Georgia farmers better get it through their heads that the free ride is over for people who think they are above the law.
June 24, 2011 at 4:58 am, Anonymous said:
I view the farmers as slave drivers, use to treating people unethically. This is not a plus for pro illegal immigration. This is a wake up call to the farmers. The same farmers who paid those workers such….Would not work for such ……
Why should we feel sorry for them. They are the reasons why Labor Unions were founded.
So, I’ll pay $2,3 for fruit. It’s better than the latter.
June 24, 2011 at 2:33 am, wigglwagon said:
“According to Bookman, the new labor shortage has forced Georgia’s farmers to leave “millions of dollars’ worth of blueberries, onions, melons and other crops unharvested and rotting in the fields.”
That is good. The farmers have spent the 25 years since the last amnesty doing everything they can to crew the legal resident workers. The farmers are deliberately letting a lot of the crops rot in hopes of forcing the politicians to rescind the new law so they can continue exploiting the illegals. For 25 years they have refused to work the legal residents and now they expect the legals to come running at a moments notice and work for the same wages and no benefits as the illegal aliens. When they bring the pay up as determined by supply and demand, they will have plenty of help. They didn’t care whether legal workers lost their homes or families or whatever while they were working illegal aliens. Why should we care about them. Just maybe, if it hurts farmers enough, they might learn to appreciate and take care of their employees like a lot of employers did in the 50′s and 60′s.
June 24, 2011 at 7:17 am, Pbgtec said:
Most of the comments so far make no sense and i can only take it as kids commenting on things they dont understand. I find it hard to believe that while everyone complains about $4 to $5 gas prices. All of a sudden no one cares about a $3 peach!? That is the end result of wasted crops and/or raising employee wages. Time and time again i watch as this country forgets its own history. HELLOOOOOO.. let me guess.. when the slaves stopped picking cotton, the farmers started paying great wages and everyone flocked to those jobs too right!? I think not.
It’s a stupid law, and the only ones cheering and praising it are the same bigots who “want their country back”. Well, guess what? You cant have it back and the more you try the more you hurt yourself in the process. Again, a lesson not learned from history!
June 24, 2011 at 10:26 am, wigglwagon said:
I find it hard to believe that some people are so simple minded about economics. “HELLOOOOOO.. let me guess.. when the slaves stopped picking cotton, the farmers started paying great wages and everyone flocked to those jobs too right!? I think not.”
You are exactly right. This country still did not reach it’s potential. To put this country on the right track, it took the idiocy and greed of employers using the Army and National Guard to kill protesting workers. In order to stop the violence against workers seeking safe and humane working conditions, in the 30′s our government finally started passing laws to protect America’s workers. That included immigration law. After that, as workers finally started getting decent wages, our economy began to boom. It takes the demand supplied by a well paid workforce for an economy to boom. Business owners such as farmers know that but they want it to be some other business that pays good instead of them.
June 24, 2011 at 7:37 am, john charles webb jr said:
‘immigration’ issues are exclusively within Federal jurisdiction (See , Arizona madness) ,
the Georgia Legislature did an ‘end run’ around ‘immigration’ by making it illegal (reasonable) to obtain employment using phony credentials .
but !!!!!!!!!!!! w t f ? were they thinking ????
June 24, 2011 at 10:37 am, wigglwagon said:
You need to read the Constitution. The states can decide which people to admit. Congress has the authority to refuse admission or to tax it. That is not exclusive federal jurisdiction.
June 24, 2011 at 2:05 pm, A Brown Dude said:
Immigration Reform and AMNESTY now – any white American who can show me a Entry Visa from Navajo, Sioux, Cherokee or Apache nations is allowed to “Preach” about immigration – the rest of you racists can go back to Europe.