The 9th Circuit Court is one of Newt Gingrich’s favorite targets. Indeed, he has called for the court to be abolished, simply because his religious politics don’t align with the court’s attempts to make all citizens fair and equal under the Constitution.
When not arrogantly pontificating about how to best organize America with his myopic view of history (obtained by way of a PhD), the Newt likes to elaborate on his crusade against the 9th Circuit, stating:
“I’ve been working on this project since 2002 when the Ninth Circuit court said that ‘one nation under God’ is unconstitutional in the Pledge of Allegiance. And I decided that if you had judges that were so radically anti-American that they thought ‘one nation under God’ was wrong, they shouldn’t be on the court.”
Newt then likes to point to history (so as to awe listeners and short-circuit their reasoning with his allegedly profound intellect), noting this precedent was established when President Thomas Jefferson abolished 18 out of 35 federal judges in 1802. What Newt won’t tell his faithful flock, or anyone who happens to be listening to his bloviations, is that Jefferson reorganized the federal judiciary for political reasons—he was opposed to the Federalists and to the shape the courts had taken under George Washington and John Adams. But of course there’s more to the story.
These Federalist judges—who dominated the Supreme and circuit courts—had been the ones aggressively enforcing The Alien and Sedition Acts, a response to Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans’ support of France after that country’s revolution.
The fourth law was The Sedition Act, a lovely piece of legislation which stated that anyone publishing “false, scandalous, and malicious writing” against the government or certain officials could be charged with a crime. The Sedition Act was used by the Federalists to ensure their primacy over Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican party.
So, you see, Newt Gingrich is full of shit, okay?
Let’s not dwell on Newt’s distorted sense of history, though, but return to his crusade against the 9th Circuit. Today, the Newt tweeted, “Court of Appeals overturning CA’s Prop 8 another example of an out of control judiciary. Let’s end judicial supremacy.”
The 9th Circuit three-judge panel was simply attempting to ensure that all individuals are treated fair and equal under the U.S. Constitution. It is not a political ruling, but a purely constitutional one.
But, let’s engage in a little of Newt Gingrich’s brand of false analogy for a moment. Perhaps Gingrich, in feeling that California was right in trampling on the rights of homosexuals, is not unlike the Federalists who, if they had had their way, would have imprisoned and fined anyone who spoke or wrote ill of a public figure.
In fact, I will now take the opportunity afforded me by Jefferson’s efforts against the Sedition Act to say to Newt Gingrich, “Fuck you, dickwad, and may many misfortunes befall you on the campaign trail.”





February 07, 2012 at 8:58 pm, Tony Dodge said:
misfortunes abound as his campaign sputters, not with a bang, but with a gingrichian whimper.
February 07, 2012 at 9:03 pm, Katherine Sumner Hammers said:
"gingrichian whimper" … I think you should be the editor of a new definitional current events blog – Dodge's Quips – or Dodge's Universe – or The World According to Dodge – for the like-minded, sharp-witted, or wish-they-were !
February 07, 2012 at 9:16 pm, Emily Stewart said:
Another entry in my Gingrich burnbook: "So, you see, Newt Gingrich is full of shit, okay?"
February 07, 2012 at 9:16 pm, Emily Stewart said:
Chelsea Shenton this article is perfect. pllleasseee read.
February 09, 2012 at 2:08 am, Mike Ashcraft said:
There's no way we can elect somebody named Newt to be our president. Seriously, other countries will laugh at us.
February 07, 2012 at 9:37 pm, Shaun Lockett said:
I think Newtpoleon needs to get his own ideas about marriage(s) straight first, okay?
February 07, 2012 at 9:37 pm, Paddy Early said:
It amazes me that in a country with such a huge population the best you can come with is an idiot like this that doesn't seem to have a brain. Maybe he's all bollocks and no brain!
February 07, 2012 at 10:04 pm, Christopher Stoehr said:
Has Gingrich, in fact, issued a statement regarding the Prop. 8 reversal ruling, or is this just rampant speculation based on past history? I know once Gingrich does say anything about this, it won't be kind, but perhaps comments meant to take up cyber space could could be saved until he does.
February 07, 2012 at 10:12 pm, Tom Dufek said:
https://twitter.com/#!/newtgingrich/status/166956181204647936 Which is linked in the article.
February 07, 2012 at 11:08 pm, Leslie Berry said:
Never in the history of histories has "U mad bro?" been more relevant.
February 07, 2012 at 11:26 pm, Kyle Politte said:
Maybe we should pool our fund and hire an assassin?
February 08, 2012 at 5:44 am, James Wallis Martin said:
I am glad Newt came out and showed his homophobic stance (no shock there) because it will cost him the Republican primary. How is this bad news? This just assures that he won't get elected.
February 08, 2012 at 3:19 pm, Steven Dooner said:
Did anyone point out to Newt that the whole "under God" thing was put in the pledge and on the money during the Eisenhower administration? I have a $10 bill from 1947 without the "In God We Trust" on it, as in the Red Scare of the 50's, we didn't want to be seen as godless communists.
February 09, 2012 at 2:32 am, Janice Dodd said:
Wouldn't it be a thrice married, and twice divorced adulterer, that had that reaction. What a power hungry hypocrite that person is. If he were to be elected. I would be forced to do one of two things. Either kill him, or myself. Not sure which.