
A new study shows what rational people have long known—analytical thinking, or solid reasoning, decreases religious belief.
According to the University of British Columbia, “The study, which will appear in tomorrow’s issue of Science, finds that thinking analytically increases disbelief among believers and skeptics alike, shedding important new light on the psychology of religious belief.”
Analytical thinking involves breaking a problem down into its constituent parts to come to a conclusion. Researchers used “problem-solving tasks and subtle experimental priming – including showing participants Rodin’s sculpture The Thinker or asking participants to complete questionnaires in hard-to-read fonts – to successfully produce “analytic” thinking.”
Researchers found that amongst the 650 participants from the U.S. and Canada, there was no decrease in religious belief of those participants who did not engage in tasks involving analytic thinking. Shocker.
The study’s lead author, Will Gervais, a PhD student in UBC’s Dept. of Psychology, says their research are based on two longstanding human cognitive systems: intuitive and analytic.
But don’t expect a method of creating sensible agnostics and atheists just yet.
“Our study builds on previous research that links religious beliefs to ‘intuitive’ thinking,” says study co-author and Associate Prof. Ara Norenzayan, UBC Dept. of Psychology. “Our findings suggest that activating the ‘analytic’ cognitive system in the brain can undermine the ‘intuitive’ support for religious belief, at least temporarily.”
The other Gervais (Ricky) would love this study.





April 26, 2012 at 4:25 pm, Analytical Thinkers Seem to Be Less Religious, Study Suggests – U.S. News & World Report | Amazing News said:
[...] an analytical fashion didn't have a …Religious Faithful Lack Logic, Study ImpliesKGO-AMThinking rationally decreases religious belief, says studyDeath and TaxesTo Keep the Faith, Don't Get AnalyticalScience AAASVancouver Sun -Science [...]
April 27, 2012 at 4:09 pm, Everett Catherine said:
Just because belief and reason come from two different parts of the brain, it doesn't mean one is more valuable than the other. It means you have to use both to be a balanced person. The same thing goes for any other set of brain regions.
August 05, 2012 at 11:16 am, William Crafton said:
Wow. Thank you.
April 27, 2012 at 7:14 pm, Elvio Vincent Angeloni said:
Yes, but that kind of "balance" is apparently enough to destroy religious faith. As anthropologist, Ashley-Montagu put (paraphrasing), religion is the pursuit of certainty without proof, whereas science is the pursuit of proof without certainty.
August 05, 2012 at 12:15 pm, Everett Catherine said:
You didn't give any evidence to refute what I wrote, and apparently you didn't read the article, either.
April 28, 2012 at 10:22 pm, Faith H Webster said:
George Carlin had it right!
April 30, 2012 at 4:05 am, Hugh Mænyste said:
I have a personal relationship with reality.