eric-schneiderman - New York's Attorney General investigating secret tax-exempt campaign groups

News

New York’s Attorney General investigating secret tax-exempt campaign groups

New York’s Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman is ramping up his inquiry into secret, tax-exempt groups, which are overtaking Super PACs as the latest shady sector of the campaign spending world. Schneiderman has requested the tax returns and other financial documents from tax-exempt groups, both Republican and Democrat.

According to The New York Times, Schneiderman—who should also be applauded for investigating the LIBOR fraud—requested the financials of ”three major Republican-affiliated groups, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, co-founded by the political strategist Karl Rove; American Action Network; and American Future Fund.” His office also requested documents from Democratic groups, including Priorities USA Action (founded by two Obama aides), Patriot Majority USA, and America Votes.

Such groups are free from nearly all of the Federal Election Commission rules governing Super PACs and contributions to candidates.

Apparently, these groups organizes themselves as 501(c)(4)s, or tax-exempt “social welfare” organizations, and claim to deal in educational not political activity, which allows them to keep their donor rolls secret. Democracy!

One can well imagine that the secrecy option would be very attractive to corporations and billionaires who don’t want to negatively effect their business. Not everyone is like billionaire Sheldon Adelson, for example, who is quite open about his willingness to spend a fortune on behalf of the GOP.

While it is encouraging to see Schneiderman pursue this course in the State of New York, there must be similar action in other states to effectively combat this legalized form of unchecked and unrelenting corporate spending and political corruption.
  1. August 10, 2012 at 5:22 pm, Eric Erdvig said:

    "One can well imagine that the secrecy option would be very attractive to corporations and billionaires who don’t want to negatively effect their business."

    It's affect. Just thought I'd point that out. Otherwise, I approve of what Schneiderman is doing. My only concern would be differentiating between legitimate social welfare causes, such as Coffee Party USA, and shadier organizations willing to do and spend whatever it takes to influence the election. It could easily escalate into a witch hunt that would hurt a great many of the legitimate social welfare organizations out there.

    Reply

Add New Comment

Showing 1 comments
Subscribe by RSS