
The government wants Americans to believe that anarchist violence is a very real possibility at the Republican and Democratic national conventions. The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security have issued a bulletin to that effect.
“FBI and DHS assess with high confidence anarchist extremists will target similar infrastructure in Tampa and Charlotte, with potentially significant impacts on public safety and transportation,” according to the propaganda alert.
Fox News, of course, took the bulletin and ran gleefully with it, running the headline “Feds warn anarchists could blockade roads, use acid-filled eggs to protest conventions”.
Even Politico, not known for its hysteria, covered the bulletin with the headline “Report: Anarchists may attack conventions,” as though anarchists were going to infiltrate the conventions and start laying waste to the building, the politicians and delegates.
People, particularly Americans, are easily controlled by their government and its various proclamations and warnings. The TSA, though not as heinous as some right wingers would like it to be, is there as a constant reminder that there is a terrorist threat, an “other,” always at our doorstep. The terror threat warning, in all its Big Brother glory, serves the same function. Such tactics are low-level, subliminal messaging to convince Americans to live in perpetual fear.
So, too, has it been for over 100 years with anarchism. Before the terrorist became boogeyman du jour there was the anarchist boogeyman. He was a useful symbol to provoke hysteria, replaced after World War II with the ubiquitous ”Russkie.”
The government used anarchist hysteria to a terrifyingly theatrical degree in the Haymarket trials and executions. What your high school history teacher isn’t allowed to tell you is that on May 4, 1886, at Haymarket Square in Chicago, anarchists, communists and workers were rallying to protest police violence at the previous day’s demonstration. The demonstration was peaceful, with even the mayor attending, until one individual (who was never identified) lit an improvised explosive that killed one officer and wounded several others. Police then unloaded on demonstrators, killing four and wounding as many as 70 others.
In the aftermath, the anarchist became a violent, fearful symbol. People seemed to quickly forget that it was anarchists who were attempting to bring a modicum of sanity to America’s ethically and morally-bankrupt hyper-capitalism, in the form of the weekend and eight-hour work day, as well as fair pay for the people who actually did a company’s manual labor.
The same sort of fearmongering surfaced again during the late ’60s when countercultural protests were common. The Weatherman (see: The Weather Underground documentary), first with its rhetoric and later with a few bombings (they never killed any civilians), gave the government all the ammunition it needed, allowing politicians and mainstream media to fashion an umbilical cord between the Weatherman and the counterculture at large. Last year’s Occupy marches and rallies provoked the same response from authorities: suddenly there were anarchists everywhere who wanted to cause violence and bring the curtain of civilization down.
The bulletin should be seen for what it is: fearmongering propaganda. Such pronouncements are the lifeblood of this American republic, dominated as it is by the Ballardian uber-rich with their private security. Theirs is the locus of the real fear in America.





August 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm, Peter Gray said:
My Middle School teacher (You guys were still learning American history in H.S?) taught us about the Haymarket riots – but focused more on the Sacco and Vancetti trial as it was more topical and local. We also learned about McKinley's assasination by anarchist-sympathizer Leon Czolgosz. Then again, we do love our history in Massachusetts.
Clearly, we don't learn history well enough if we keep cycling through the same list of "enemies of the state". That said, I've been to many protests where anarchists were serving no purpose except to undermine the message of the protest and escalate confrontations with police and other protesters. Their movement has more to fix than their image and more often then not they are total dicks to everyone not hiding behind black bandanas and juvenile ideology.
August 23, 2012 at 11:32 pm, Carl Grasso said:
every anarchist i've met was a total dick and didn't understand anarchy as a political movement. they should have called themselves chaosists.
August 24, 2012 at 5:04 am, Kirktv Avatar said:
control and control for no reason other than control actually creates anarchy : do the math — its a basic meta-physical law – control is manufactured – chaos is manufactured – frankly – its all manufactured -
August 24, 2012 at 5:05 am, Kirktv Avatar said:
ps – Iam not an anarchist….
August 25, 2012 at 2:02 am, Roger Taylor said:
I predict a false flag followed by an unbelievably baseles arrest
August 25, 2012 at 2:03 am, Roger Taylor said:
Uh, baseless
August 25, 2012 at 7:46 pm, Kristie Robinson said:
I'm not a Anarchist, but I am sure that there will be a lot of Unhappy people that will stand out front and let their feelings be heard! and GOOD!
August 25, 2012 at 8:04 pm, Joe Rybicki said:
It is an unfortunate fact that what is perceived as the "anarchist movement" is very much infiltrated by undercover police and intelligence agencies. Anyone who is dressed all in black smashing things up or setting fire to cars is not an anarchist, they are either an agent provocateur or a useful (to the state) idiot. I've been on many protests, and I've seen with my own eyes at these events, as well as on many videos of other protests, black-clad anarchists smashing things and setting fire to things while the police look on and do nothing, allowing the press to get their photos of the 'violent protest'. Many of these individuals are then spotted walking behind police lines into police-only areas unmolested, meaning that they are clearly working for the state in some capacity. The police then go in and arrest all the peaceful protesters for the actions of the agent provocateurs. True anarchists don't want to destroy things, they want a highly organised society of equals that basically works on the golden rule of do unto others as you would have them do to you. True anarchists believe that human beings are capable of living their lives in a good way without being forced to.
August 25, 2012 at 10:38 pm, Brian Sabo said:
Useful Idiot
August 26, 2012 at 4:29 pm, Paul White said:
An anarchist wants a highly organized society? Isn't that the exact opposite of the definition of Anarchy????
August 26, 2012 at 10:50 pm, Matthew John Parkyn said:
nature has its own form of organisation. do you see it being policed? no, animals can survive without farms.
August 27, 2012 at 5:07 pm, Joe Rybicki said:
Paul White, real anarchists don't want a state, but they still want society. The American tradition of Anarchism tends to be more individualist, but really it is a totally different philosophy to the European model and shouldn't have the same name. the Spanish Anarchists were extremely well organised, for example.
August 28, 2012 at 6:17 pm, Danny Dizaster said:
some can yes. but not in large numbers… unless you count insect eating birds. OH! and fish! fish do an ok job. Farms ARE actually kind of necessary considering the number of people on the planet. The hunter/gatherer lifestyle CANNOT support large numbers of densely populated humans. Anarchy is a very useful tool when used as a catalyst for change, but it sucks as an end goal.
August 28, 2012 at 6:18 pm, Joe Rybicki said:
That's why some bright spark came up with Anarcho-Syndicalism.
August 25, 2012 at 8:08 pm, Tom Long said:
Sounds like a prelude to a false flag Op… All they need to do now is instigate an incident, suppress it, and then they have the excuse to request more funding and further erosion of our freedoms! They run the same play every time…. and we continue to be surprised! #apathy
August 26, 2012 at 1:05 am, Tim Long said:
These idiots use freedom of speech rights to riot and destroy. Shoot them
August 26, 2012 at 2:09 am, Tom Long said:
Tim Long I have no love for the lunatic fringe! The real people that "may" protest don't bother me at all… it's the "paid agitators" that are there for reasons that have nothing to do with Free Speech, that's what I'm talking about!
Example: If there were 10 medal of honor veterans there protesting and an 11th person joins their group and throws a rock… do you still want to open fire on the group? I don't think so!
August 27, 2012 at 9:42 pm, Rory Petts said:
part of me fears that intimidation in protests against the elites will lead to martial law and complete control through loss of civil liberties. part of me thinks that if peaceful action is ignored for another 10-20 years the elites will have the technology to supress all rebellion with armed intelligent robots/drones. its a sorry state of affairs and the knowledge about the monetary system and false flag terror needed for change is now commonplace worldwide. even if everyone knows we are being shafted and had a mass gathering the police could not silence how would the goventment take advantage of having all of those people on the streets at once. protest in peace and others will join.
September 08, 2012 at 11:05 am, The Attitude of an Anarchist by Tom Finnigan « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL said:
[...] Government stoking anarchist fears… again [...]
September 12, 2012 at 7:32 am, Insurgent Anarchism; An Idea Whose Time Has Come – Part I | WHISTLE newsroom said:
[...] DJ Pangburn, editor of online magazine, cautioned the public regarding government promoting hysteria with predictions of violent anarchists in the lead up to the Republican and Democratic Conventions. Pangburn reminded people of who real anarchists have been historically: People seemed to quickly forget that it was anarchists who were attempting to bring a modicum of sanity to America’s ethically and morally-bankrupt hyper-capitalism, in the form of weekend and eight-hour work day, as well as fair pay for the people who actually did a company’s manual labor. [...]
September 16, 2012 at 12:44 pm, Insurgent Anarchism: an idea whose time has come (Part I) | Reflections on a Revolution ROAR said:
[...] [...]
September 17, 2012 at 4:44 am, Reflections on a Revolution » ...............Join the white rider and his horses to Kyrgyzstan ........ said:
[...] Pangburn, editor of the online magazine Death and Taxes, cautioned the public regarding the government’s active promotion of hysteria through the prediction that [...]
September 19, 2012 at 2:49 pm, Roar | Occupy KC Journal Blog said:
[...] Pangburn, editor of the online magazine Death and Taxes, cautioned the public regarding the government’s active promotion of hysteria through the prediction that [...]
November 02, 2012 at 5:08 pm, Insurgent Anarchism; An Idea Whose Time Has Come – Part I « Tahrir-ICN said:
[...] DJ Pangburn, editor of online magazine, cautioned the public regarding government promoting hysteria with predictions of violent anarchists in the lead up to the Republican and Democratic Conventions. Pangburn reminded people of who real anarchists have been historically: People seemed to quickly forget that it was anarchists who were attempting to bring a modicum of sanity to America’s ethically and morally-bankrupt hyper-capitalism, in the form of weekend and eight-hour work day, as well as fair pay for the people who actually did a company’s manual labor. [...]