
Let’s face it—elections boil down to soundbyte branding. In this election, Obama is the cool black guy who wants to help the middle, and Romney is the superrich stuffy white guy who wants to help the rich. Whom you vote for in this election can pretty accurately be distilled into which of those narratives you want to support.
Which led me to believe (and I think I’m not alone here) that lower and middle income white voters from the South would go overwhelmingly for Romney. Not just because he’s white (although the racism still running rampant in white America certainly helps), but for the same reason this bracket has gone Republican for decades: the GOP has aligned itself as the party of the rich, and everyone idolizes the rich. This is the bet baked into the American dream—that anyone, regardless of where he or she starts out, can make it to the top. So to scrutinize the rich is to scrutinize your own future glory in which you live out the American dream.
But it turns out I was wrong. Kind of.
A new poll from Reuters shows lower and middle income Southern whites are highly skeptical of Mitt’s cash. According to data complied from thousands of households across 11 states, “38 percent of these voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who is ‘very wealthy’ than one who isn’t. This is well above the 20 percent who said they would be less likely to vote for an African-American.”
Anecdotally, many of the voters cited skepticism for Romney rooted both his wealth and his Mormonism, which taken together bestow a kind of unrelatable “otherness” on Romney. “In Lynchburg, many haven’t forgotten Romney’s casual offer to bet Texas Governor Rick Perry $10,000 or his mention of his wife’s couple of Cadillacs,” writes Reuters.
Granted, when asked point blank whether they support Romney or Obama, Southern whites go for Romney 46 percent to 29 percent. But this showing isn’t nearly as strong as it’s been for Republicans in previous elections, and Reuters notes Romney would need to win over 60% of white voters just to stay competitive, given Obama’s overwhelming support among black and latino voters.
It all comes down to likability. Another new poll from ABC found that 52% of America would like to have Obama over for dinner as opposed to 33% for Romney. In 2008 Obama remarked that Hillary Clinton was “likable enough.” In all probability, Mitt needs to find a way to make himself more likable to white Southern voters in a hurry, or he could be in trouble.





September 11, 2012 at 8:52 pm, Charles Kreuzer said:
Tell me Alex – What's the American Dream? To work hard and someday become wealthy, or to work hard and someday live in mediocrity?
If you can answer that, you'd see the difference in what Romney's and Obama's visions really are.
The thing you need to understand is that Romney wants us ALL to succeed! Obama want's us all stuck in the middle…
BTW – who signs YOUR paycheck? A "rich" person or a middle class person? Who gives you raises when they have enough money? How will you get a raise if that "rich" person has to send more money to the government? Where will that raise come from? Will Obama give you your next raise?
Once you realize that the government isn't what makes your life easier, you'll figure out that Obama's "government trickle down economics" does nothing but cause more debt and more unemployment.
September 11, 2012 at 10:34 pm, Noah Richard said:
if you define succeeding as being wealthy than it's not feasible to posit that Romney a serious politician would"want us all to succeed" we can't all be wealthy. there has to a middle class.economists agree that the bigger it is the better for the country.
September 13, 2012 at 2:01 pm, Mike DaMan said:
@Charles- you assume that rich business owners hand out bonuses and don't keep most of that money for themselves. That trickle down theory didn't work for Bush…why would it work under Romney? If I remember correctly, those policies are exactly what got us into this mess!
September 13, 2012 at 2:46 pm, Virginia Hines-Thomas said:
Last time I check as a soldier in the Army, my checks are pay for from taxpayers which are mostly middle class. Even my old civilian job, the middle class owner of the shop signed my paychecks. Middle class is what's paying for everything in America, not the 1%…
September 13, 2012 at 4:29 pm, DaJosha Foskey said:
I'm pretty sure Pres. Bush coined the phrase trickle down economics… Oh, and there are a lot of people waiting for raises that they may never see because the wealthy have made more money over the past four decades but things haven't changed because they don't like middle class or the poor. Youre probably a racist anyway
September 14, 2012 at 4:14 am, John Quincy Astor Ceo said:
And so we should reward the GOP who have had 8 years of failed leadership prior to Obama being elected with another 4 years? 4 years after Obama took office America is still here. The economy is starting to grow(albeit) slowly and FED not Obama is stimulating the economy. Let's not forget Greenspan, Bernak and Buffet ALL champion Obama-economics. Obama actually has spent less than all Presidents sense Eisenhower. The GOP is a bastion of the past. The only birhgt lights in that party are Senator Rubio and Ron Paul. I think Hermain had a good idea with the 9-9-9 flat tax idea but the GOP doesn't know how to connect with the future. Like it or not the Democratic party represents the future of America. Their party is diverse and the US is "browning!" The Democrats have large numbers of blacks, whites, latinos, asians, muslims, christians, jews, etc…The GOP is 85% white! so in order for them to win they must start recruiting conservative politicians like Obama who can connect with the masses. Rubio is the closest one but his RNC speech was "stiff" as hell. If we gave that scumbag Bush and Cheney 8 more years i'll be damn if I'm ready to hand this country over to Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. But I will say that if the GOP doesn't win this year that the end of the Republican party because in 2016 America will be even more of a pluralistic society. The GOP needs to get hip to the middle-class and start preaching to blacks, latinos and the youth.
September 14, 2012 at 4:15 am, John Quincy Astor Ceo said:
Pardon the spelling and grammatical errors i'm multi-tasking. I'm typing this while being driven in a Volvo.lol.
September 13, 2012 at 1:32 pm, JoAnn Anderson said:
Damn Charles Kreeuzer if you believe that you believe I wanna sell your car to you. Mitt Romney is worth 250million dollars he had enough money to give each of his sons 100million each. What job has Mitt Romney or any of his sons spent they're money to create? I'm not talking about Bain. Mitt Romney won't show us his taxes yet he is eager to change the taxes if that don't tell you something ain't right. He was the Governor of Mass went in with high rating because a lot of people thought jut like you he's a man that must know what he' doing. They went from 34th in the state to 47th.
September 13, 2012 at 1:53 pm, D'Yauna Wells said:
Amen @JoAnn Anderson….Mitt Romney could care less about the poor or middle class; this is the same guy that said at the convention if you dont have money then ask your parents for it. What if your parents dont have the money? He's a joke of a presidential candidate
September 13, 2012 at 4:54 pm, Caroline Morales said:
LOL!
September 13, 2012 at 4:58 pm, Eileen Keene said:
Later for mitt who??????
September 13, 2012 at 5:28 pm, Wallace Ford said:
The Trials of Mitt!
September 13, 2012 at 5:37 pm, Eric ET Washington said:
Obama all the way!
September 13, 2012 at 6:53 pm, Claire Adams said:
Mitt Romney sucks at life…
September 14, 2012 at 1:41 am, Rheam Deen said:
You're sexey…..
September 14, 2012 at 2:18 am, Cora Turner said:
Coming from his background….. I looks like his life does not suck too bad… I'm just saying.
September 13, 2012 at 6:11 pm, Miara SoPrecious White said:
A damn shame
September 13, 2012 at 6:54 pm, Renee Love said:
Lazy a@s bastard, can't even stand up like common folks. A mess!
September 13, 2012 at 9:37 pm, Nadia Thomas said:
Jill Stein all the way!
September 14, 2012 at 12:57 am, Derrick Jackson said:
I don't think that Mitt is a good person and will make a bad president. However, I wouldn't won't the job of being president, too stressful & shady.
September 14, 2012 at 1:19 am, Jacob Schiele Eaton said:
Big problems for Mitt
September 14, 2012 at 1:57 am, Tamekia White said:
How can anyone in their right mind believe that anyone can make a damn miracle happen in 4 years hell it took us more more years than that to get into the shit we're in! And how is Mitt gonna create jobs and make it any better when he agreed along with all the other rich bastards to close down businesses and send jobs over seas! Please help me understand some damn body!
September 14, 2012 at 10:04 am, Dontasia Devereaux said:
I agree with this summation. They start us young on the "American Dream" so that we will spend our whole lives seeking it. What they fail to mention is that if you are not born into a wealthy family, your chances of attaining wealth, especially Mitt's kind of wealth is highly unlikely. This is not to say it is impossible, but it is definitely difficult. I think Mitt's biggest problem is that he has absolutely no reference to what we as hardworking Americans go through. People seem to think they are Protecting their assets by voting for this person. Really a bit sad and desperate honestly.
September 14, 2012 at 10:44 am, Delano Taylor said:
@charles. You are right that rich people give bonuses and sign checks. And that the American dream is not to work hard and live in mediocrity. It's to work hard and be successful in what ever you want to be. The truth is everyone can't be rich. Now who do you think makes the rich people rich. Not other rich people. Rich people don't eat at McDonalds or shop at Walmart or stay at holiday inn or Hilton. It's the middle class and poor that make the rich people profits so they can write checks and give bonuses. When you see ads on tv do they ever market to the rich. I never once have seen an ad for a Ferrari or Lamborghini. Donald trump doesn't have ads for his hotel on abc or NBC. Martha Stuart doesn't advertise to rich people. You don't find her line of products on rodeo drive. They are in Walmart or Macy's. The majority of people in America aren't rich they are middle class and poor. Thats who rich people market thief products too.
September 28, 2012 at 9:40 am, Romney’s wealth as stated by campaign omits at least $100 million | Death and Taxes said:
[...] us out of economic disaster seemed like an easy sell. But it hasn’t gone that way for Mitt—recent polls show his enormous personal wealth has alienated him from voters, who feel Mitt can’t [...]