
You’ve got to hand it to some of these high finance guys—their audacity knows no bounds. (And I don’t mean just thinking they can rap.)
In case your memory is foggy here’s how the A.I.G. bailout went down: Back in ’08 A.I.G, an insurance company, had sold “credit default swaps”—which are a weird form of insurance policy for investors against companies going bankrupt—to every Wall Street firm out there and god knows who else. After Lehman Brothers went bankrupt and the financial world went into tailspin, it looked like all kinds of firms could go under—so many that if they did, A.I.G. wouldn’t have enough cash to cover the insurance payouts it owed on all the credit default swaps it had sold. If that happened and A.I.G. suddenly went bankrupt all the Wall Street banks A.I.G. owed would lose billions, and if that happened they’d drag each other down and pretty soon the whole country would start looking like the bank-run scene in “It’s A Wonderful Life.” Not good.
So the government came in and bought $182 billion worth of A.I.G. stock—enough to cover the payouts it might potentially need to make and enough to restore confidence in the financial world and prevent a systemic collapse. Last month the government finally sold the last of the A.I.G. stock it had been holding, to a handsome profit—as much as $22 billion, although some insiders say this figure is misleading.
Anyway, while plenty of taxpayers were sore about it at the time, the government pretty much saved the day. The only other option for A.I.G. was bankruptcy, which would have meant disaster for everyone else. And now according to New York Times the board of A.I.G. is considering suing the U.S. for it.
The gripe seems to stem from that supposed $22 billion in profit. Former A.I.G. CEO Maurice R. Greenberg, who resigned in 2005 amid an accounting scandal (of course) filed a lawsuit alleging that the government had taken advantage of the company with a “punitive” interest rate north of 14% and that it had unfair influence in seeing that they actually paid out the billions that they owed. Both of these things supposedly took money away from A.I.G. shareholders that they could have just kept for themselves. (Except they couldn’t, cuz they were going bankrupt, remember?)
“The government is not empowered to trample shareholder and property rights even in the midst of a financial emergency,” the lawsuit says.
Except it seems to forget that A.I.G. willingly accepted the government’s terms to get the cash. A New York judge rejected the case saying A.I.G “voluntarily accepted the hard terms offered by the one and only rescuer that stood between it and imminent bankruptcy.” He said the suit “paints a portrait of government treachery worthy of an Oliver Stone movie.”
A Washington, DC judge has agreed to hear the case, however, so lawyers from Mr. Greenburg’s new company will gather at A.I.G.’s offices on Wednesday to try and persuade the the current board to join in on the lawsuit. Defense lawyers from the Justice Department will also be present to try to persuade them the lawsuit is ridiculous.





January 08, 2013 at 10:19 am, Sunraynews | Top US news said:
[...] the terms of the deal were unfair. The …AIG May Join Suit Over US BailoutABC News (blog)AIG might sue the US government for saving itDeath and Taxesall 93 news [...]
January 08, 2013 at 10:21 am, AIG may join bailout suit against US government – Reuters | allpharmacyblogs.com said:
[...] Bailout by Suing the GovernmentNew York MagazineAIG Weighs Suing the GovernmentNew York Times (blog)AIG might sue the US government for saving itDeath and TaxesABA Journal -Business Insider -ABC News (blog)all 97 news [...]
January 08, 2013 at 3:34 pm, Al Eng said:
Wow! A Govt judge throwing out the case. Who'd a thunk it?
January 08, 2013 at 3:37 pm, Tim Willhide said:
The attorney general should bring up felony fraud charges against these arogant CEOs and cease their assets
January 08, 2013 at 3:59 pm, Patrick Binder said:
Why? The US committed more fraud then they did, and do on a daily basis. The State is not great.
January 08, 2013 at 4:00 pm, Peter Daveloose said:
you mean sieze?
January 08, 2013 at 6:03 pm, Tim Willhide said:
That's just a stupid response patrick so just let everyone rip people off? Greed is the problem that needs fixed and this has geed all over it
January 08, 2013 at 10:43 am, AIG Weighs Joining Suit Against US Government – Wall Street Journal | Finance Bar - Daily Finance News Magazine said:
[...] Feel It HAS To Sue The GovernmentBusiness InsiderNew York Times (blog) -ABA Journal -Death and Taxesall 104 news [...]
January 08, 2013 at 4:03 pm, Taylor Henderson said:
So the U.S government buys over $160 billion worth of devalued AIG stock to save the financial structure of this nation, and now AIG is pissed that the government is making a profit on those investments? The criminal hypocrisy involved is astounding, but not exactly shocking.
January 08, 2013 at 4:05 pm, Peggy Wilson said:
WOW, amazing. I worked for AIG once. I found them to embody everything that I dislike about the potential of corporate America.
January 08, 2013 at 4:06 pm, Warren Boorman said:
I always thought it was against the law to sue the federal government. I guess that has changed.
January 08, 2013 at 5:57 pm, Nick Fuhrmann said:
Why would you think that? The government is not free from liability. It acts as if it isn't, but it is.
January 08, 2013 at 4:07 pm, Chip Carpenter said:
Wow – almost unfathomable, except that it isn't because this guy is obvious an a$$hat.
January 08, 2013 at 4:09 pm, Herman Gan said:
The term "stupid" does not even cut it. Let's label them "dumb dumb". It just sounds better for the members of the board of AIG.
January 08, 2013 at 4:09 pm, Tyler Sowder said:
I can careless about what the government is charging them they are paying us back.
January 08, 2013 at 4:16 pm, Leigha Sowder Myers said:
you hope they are lol
January 08, 2013 at 4:10 pm, Sanna Olsen said:
The greedy always trying to be stealthy. Instead of getting money they should do time like Bernie Madoff. Ponzi scams are running wild at AIG
January 08, 2013 at 5:59 pm, Nick Fuhrmann said:
The government is a ponzi scheme.
January 08, 2013 at 4:11 pm, Pablo Velazquez said:
Another classic example of how much is an idiot obama is
January 08, 2013 at 5:09 pm, Fred Johnson said:
You may indeed postulate that Obama is an idiot. But to just randomly state that Obama is an idiot in this context only shines a light on your supreme lack of intelligence. 1- Bush bailed out AIG in the last months of his presidency. Not Obama. 2- The Treasury is making money on this, making it seem that Bush not only saved the financial markets further stress, but did so at a profit. I would love to see how you can determine from the course of events that Obama is somehow an idiot in this context.
January 08, 2013 at 6:00 pm, Nick Fuhrmann said:
It should be said that the Democrats in Congress are responsible for economic woes in the housing market rather than Obama.
January 08, 2013 at 4:11 pm, Jason Thacker said:
And never a mention of the manner in which the Democratic Affordable Housing Act forced banks to take radical steps to cover bad loans that the AHA forced them to make in order to remain in the mortgage market. Not. One. Word.
Yes, banks behaved badly.
But first the government decided to use regulation to interfere in the private markets, with the same result such action always has: They screwed things up.
So lets distribute blame here evenly. Yes, the banks screwed up. They had to cover the bad loans new government regulations forced them to make somehow.
January 08, 2013 at 6:04 pm, Tim Willhide said:
Another dumb comment no one forced banks to make loans
January 08, 2013 at 4:11 pm, Steve Hunt said:
This really turns their nice little ad campaign on its head. They need to put at the end, so with your help we survived and were able to make you a profit for taking the risk…now we're going to try and take it back from you.
January 08, 2013 at 6:12 pm, John D. Jensen said:
They should have let them all fail and put the execs in jail for fraud.
January 09, 2013 at 3:44 am, Steve Hunt said:
Unfortunately, that would have been catastrophic. They just had their hands too deep into too many things. I totally agree with putting them in jail. Hopefully, they denounce the suit. Remember this? (hopefully, the current AIG management is) http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5021189n
January 08, 2013 at 4:12 pm, Fred Flintsone said:
Give them $182 million to save them for insolvency and possible criminal charges and they sue you I guess their way of saying thank you. And people wonder what's wrong?
January 08, 2013 at 4:13 pm, Illia Kornea said:
I said at the beginning, No Bail Outs for Nobody, That's Why!
January 08, 2013 at 11:14 am, AIG may join bailout lawsuit against US government – Reuters | urbandestruction.com said:
[...] of the deal …AIG Might Thank America for Bailout by Suing the GovernmentNew York MagazineAIG might sue the US government for saving itDeath and TaxesNew York can't object to $115 million AIG shareholder deal: judgeChicago [...]
January 08, 2013 at 4:20 pm, Daniel Marrs said:
They really don't understand the 47 per cent that will be on that jury!
January 08, 2013 at 4:23 pm, Ralph Swan said:
"The government pretty much saved the day" give me a break. Stop trying to save the day by spending money.
What happened to reporting the facts and letting people make their decision based on them?
January 08, 2013 at 5:58 pm, Nick Fuhrmann said:
Agreed. Alex Moore, Death and Taxes has always considered corporate welfare a bad thing. Why is the government buying AIG's stuff saving the day?
January 08, 2013 at 11:25 am, AIG said to consider suing US for bailout that saved company – Los Angeles Times | allpharmacyblogs.com said:
[...] the GovernmentNew York MagazineAIG: Thank You America, But We May Sue YouForbesABA Journal -Death and Taxesall 116 news [...]
January 08, 2013 at 4:41 pm, Vlad Voroninski said:
Bahahaha! Briiiiliiant!
January 08, 2013 at 5:23 pm, Junior Aleman said:
Got some balls, that's for sure.
January 09, 2013 at 10:10 am, Democrats blast AIG’s ‘outrageous’ threat to sue feds over bailout – The Hill’s On The Money « Ye Olde Soapbox said:
[...] A.I.G. might sue the U.S. government for saving it (deathandtaxesmag.com) [...]
January 09, 2013 at 5:25 pm, A.I.G. decides not to sue U.S. government for saving it, after all | Death and Taxes said:
[...] revealing earlier this week that A.I.G. might sue the U.S. government for saving it—and taking $22 billion in profit on the deal when the Treasury sold the last of its [...]