As if Interpol didn’t have its hands full with the global search for Wikileaks leader Julian Assange, the agency will soon be tasked with transmitting a Nigerian arrest warrant for former vice president Dick Cheney.
This seemingly fanciful international incident could quite easily become a serious domestic headache for the Obama administration.
Officials in the African nation want to try Cheney for his alleged role in a bribe scandal in which Halliburton-owned company KBR gave $180 million to Nigerian officials between 1994 and 2004 in exchange for lucrative natural gas contracts.
Cheney was KBR’s CEO between 1995 and 2000, when he stepped down to run with George W. Bush. KBR and Halliburton pled guilty to the charges last year, and paid a whopping $579 million fine, but this latest development calls Cheney’s direct actions into question, and the Nigerians are dead set on getting justice.
We are filing charges against Cheney,” insisted Femi Babafemi, spokesman for Nigeria’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
The idea Cheney being arrested sounds absurd, and the Nigerian news has been received by many with an amused shrug, and no small amount of dismissal. ‘Washington Post’ reporter Al Kamen, for example, wrote, “It’s not as if Cheney, now suffering from some very serious heart problems, was planning to take the family on a cruise up the Niger Delta any time soon. The odds of his showing up in Africa – except maybe for a hunting trip – are zero.” I doubt the Obama administration’s taking this as lightly.
Despite what you may think about Interpol, the group does not command an international army of coppers and flatfoots. Its more of an information-sharing agency, one that helps coordinate information and efforts among its 188 member countries, whose own governments are meant to enforce potential warrants. It’s not Interpol‘s responsibility to arrest Cheney. That honor goes to the associated government, which puts Obama’s Department of Justice in a compromising position.
Political implications of arresting a former vice president aside, Obama and company are presented with two choices.
First, it can ignore the warrant, thereby straining relations with resource-rich Nigeria, and also undercut its current leadership role in Interpol, which is currently headed by American Ronald Noble, who worked for the Treasury Department during Bill Clinton’s presidential tenure.
The second option: move forward and nab Cheney. This would only inflame the right wing, though, and not simply because of revered Cheney’s elevated status among the conservative set.
Obama inflamed Republicans last year by extending certain diplomatic immunities to Interpol agents in the U.S., leading conservatives to claim the President was eroding the Constitution.
‘The Washington Examiner’ suggested the move “may be the most destructive blow ever struck against American constitutional civil liberties,” while Andrew C. McCarthy from ‘The National Review’ claimed an “international police force” would be working “unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law.”
While their message was grossly misguided — again, Interpol doesn’t arrest — it echoes the current conservative claims that the President’s chipping away at our liberties, and could prove catchy enough to complicate Obama’s standing among the GOP and their allies.
When the Nigerian government issues their warrant, which could come this week, the White House will be forced to defend any action or inaction, and this apparently frivolous case will become a bigger political brouhaha than anyone imagines.





December 03, 2010 at 4:54 am, Ellebean said:
I don't understand why The Administration should guard against “inflaming the right wing.” Can someone elaborate on why they should not just let justice take its course and Cheney face whatever?
December 03, 2010 at 3:48 pm, andrewbelonsky said:
Obama shouldn't pussyfoot around the right, but that doesn't mean he won't. Especially with his reelection coming up and the “shellacking,” coupled with the new Republican leaders, will more than likely make him more conciliatory than combative.
December 22, 2010 at 8:45 am, Nat said:
What Republicans will vote for Barack Obama for a second term? His approach only is sane if we are currently witnessing a political suicide. He refuses to advertise the things he has done right, continues to bend to a party that will NOT work with him and also will not vote for him.
One reason BO was elected-he tapped into new demographics-which he immediately ignored after election.
He is basically a Manchurian candidate-a corporate sit in until a Reuplican gets back in office and executes even more aggressively anti-democratic laws.
I mean, BO doesn't even make any attempt to frame what he has done right, look at GWB in comparison.
December 03, 2010 at 5:56 am, chagrined said:
The right wing is already inflamed just because an African American is occupying the White House, built by African Americans. Who cares if the right wing is inflamed? The important things is for justice to prevail and it would be poetic justice to see old Dick in the slammer in Nigeria! You go justice!
December 03, 2010 at 11:24 am, Tony said:
I'm a conservative, and I say arrest him. There are crooks (A LOT) in both parties. Let them all stand trial for their crimes.
December 03, 2010 at 11:49 am, Madeleine Tector said:
I'm a conservative and I think he should face the music same as anyone else. He did a lot of shifty things in Nigeria and they deserve justice for it.
December 03, 2010 at 3:47 pm, andrewbelonsky said:
No doubt many conservatives share your view. I wonder, if given a choice, how many people would rather see Cheney tried for war-related crimes than bribery.
December 03, 2010 at 2:39 pm, Goldman2067 said:
Nigeria? I have millions sitting in a bank account somewhere in Nigeria right now I am told. All I have to do is send my banking and credit card information to a guy named Somili Waroemdi in Nigeria to claim it……….
Come to think of it, my neighbor got the same email….hmmmmm. Nigeria…
December 11, 2010 at 8:15 am, WeeFree said:
The likes of Dick Cheney helped create the atmosphere of runaway corruption in that country. If an American entity gives $180 million in bribes to officials in Nigeria, the ordinary man on their streets is bound to think there much more to be taken if you can get through.
December 03, 2010 at 3:06 pm, Lahlaxza said:
Why is a bribery case of 180 million considered frivolous by the author?
December 03, 2010 at 3:46 pm, andrewbelonsky said:
I don't think it's frivolous, but, as I said, many people find the idea of arresting Cheney absurd, since he was, after all, our vice president.
December 04, 2010 at 1:36 am, Puckster said:
Nice dance around Lahlaxza's comment. You said in the article that the case was “apparently frivolous” you did not say “absurd”, unless we are to believe that it is apparently frivolous to others but apparently not to you. Aren't these your frivolous words and your ideas? Apparently not.
December 04, 2010 at 1:15 am, nancy said:
Massacring 3,000 Statespeople in Manhattan isn't as punishable as monetary corruption in Nigeria? Hmmmm.
December 04, 2010 at 3:30 pm, Bruce said:
Nigeria is turning into one big toxic mess because of oil/gas. Halliburton is well on their way to joining Chesapeake energy and others to doing the same thing all over our country, as they continue to do in Nigeria.
This has little or nothing to do with a rag-tag band of USA haters who got together and hijacked several passenger jets. Perhaps the only connection is how we think that we should be able to destroy the lives of others, and their countries, with impunity. Our corporations think that way, and so does our military. What goes around comes around.
December 04, 2010 at 1:21 am, Kevin Frejlach said:
You said the case was “apparently frivolous” not “absurd” unless we are to believe that it is apparently frivolous to others but apparently not you. Aren't these your frivolous words and your ideas…apparently not.
December 04, 2010 at 3:26 pm, Faruque Ahmed said:
Prosecute Dick Cheney for war criems too.
December 04, 2010 at 3:27 pm, Faruque Ahmed said:
Prosecute Dick Cheney for war crimes too.
December 05, 2010 at 8:24 pm, Charles Manson Texting From Prison | Death and Taxes said:
[...] is a freedom. Somewhat amazingly, cell phones weren’t officially off limits in prison until President Obama signed a bill in August making them illegal for inmates. For anyone who’s watched “The [...]
December 06, 2010 at 7:06 pm, Jperss said:
Cheney could only be “revered' in the United States as a former VP. Only an American can consider corruption of such magnitude to be frivolous. This man is part of a murderous clique of Americans with no demarcation points in the political spectrum. Enough proof is there for those who are willing to remove the blinkers. Bush is “writing” books and doing six figure speeches. He is confessing to torture verbally and in writing. He does so with impunity, cause he knows he enjoys immunity from prosecution. He takes assurance that Obama does not want to look “backward” when asked about prosecuting Bush for a litany of crimes. Yes, not only VPs are revered – all past higher office holders are. The position of President is equated with Royalty – with parade and inaugaration balls ala elegance'.
The United States has no intention of being part of the International Criminal Court. There is a very telling reason for that. No current or ex VP, President in the US will be tried for anything anywhere – be it on US soil or internationally because the status quo will be diminished and the populace will start to see things from a new and startling perspective.
They cannot now- as the media is overrun with “presstitutes”.
December 08, 2010 at 8:33 pm, Cristopher said:
He has gotten away with too much. The evidence of his and his friends' illegal activities are for the most part, public record. Why hasn't he been arrested years ago. Citizens should storm capitol hill and demand for his arrest! We should boycott everything and withdraw all of our money from the banks until, the criminals in Washington step down and cheney AND Bush AND Rove AND Rumsfeld are arrested. Why have we been so willing to let illegal activity persist when their illegal activities are PUBLIC RECORD! The people cannot continue to be lazy!
December 10, 2010 at 7:59 am, mrobama said:
i hereby laugh my fanny off at this story….hahahahahaha
December 15, 2010 at 4:35 am, R12nasa said:
Why is this considered a ” frivolous case ” ? The USA currently imprisons many thousands of its citizens for much less serious offenses. When is the double standard going to stop ? dumb question I'm certain
December 15, 2010 at 7:43 pm, John said:
He should be arrested and jailed for life. He has caused millions to suffer, whether from war or corruption. He is among the biggest scumbags to walk the earth.
December 22, 2010 at 8:39 am, Nat said:
Ok–Cheney had a 13% approval rating at the end of the 2nd term, and in early 09 he polled 44% dissapproved of him -w/ another 42% undecided.
WHY is the prez and his admin worrying about how to handle this? No one likes Cheney except those on the far far right. This illustrates exactly why Democrat presidents always fizzle (maybe Clinton got 2 terms due to the economy-I mean a full blooded attempt to ruin him failed), they don't play rough, while the Rethugs play over the top rough. Look at 20th century Dems: BO, Al Gore, Kerry, J.Carter, Kennedy(might have been good but killed), LBJ(not a liberal),FDR + Truman-the only strong Democratic leaders the party has seen hold power in over 100 years. Howard Dean tapped into what the majority of people who live in urban areas, on the coasts, and in othther liberal pockets(Like Austin TX) want to hear and was forceful–yet he was taken out by propaganda from a SINGLE gaffee.
Let's face it, the Dems have been a colossal disappointment…
April 29, 2013 at 7:53 pm, Shain Ali said:
that is a joke it will never hapen ! IT'S A BRAVE STANCE FROM AFRICA