Entertainment

Bill Maher vs. Jon Stewart: Who’s a Better Keith Olbermann Replacement?

With Keith Olbermann gone, there remain only two gray-haired, left-leaning political pundits with a scathing wit and a captive audience. One of them will need to step up and lead left-wing media consumers into the 2012 elections. Who’s the better choice?

Not that either Maher nor Stewart will literally replace Olbermann—with NBC burned by Olbermann’s headstrong manner it’s unlikely they’d turn to Maher or Stewart, both lighting rods in their own right, to fill the void.

But with Olbermann gone from MSNBC, it’s likely that Maher or Stewart will be advanced in the public eye as next in line for the left’s go-to pundit. Olbermann had advanced past commentators like Chris Matthews who were at least as incisive and had greater experience, I believe, because of one reason—he had a sense of humor.

How else do you explain a former sports anchor ascending to the role of America’s most trusted left-leaning pundit over Matthews, a former Congressional staffer and presidential speech writer under Carter? For all the talk of “civility” these days, which at its worst seems to want to neuter all differences between the left and right, the left has shown itself to possess a distinguishing trait: it appreciates a good joke.

It’s no coincidence that the most significant show of public solidarity from the left since electing President Obama was a gigantic comedy act. Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews might provide astute commentary and draw on the richest political knowledge, but there’s no way the two of them together could galvanize a crowd like the one at Stewart/Colbert’s Rally to Restore Sanity.

And yet, of the two Jon Stewart has shown himself in recent months to be the one capable of real influence. Colbert’s character humor is too constricting for people to really trust him to inform their perspective. What we’ve seen from the success of funny pundits is a paradox—we want them to mock (because there’s no other way through this stuff than to laugh) and at the same time, we want them to speak truth.

Bill Maher might not have the kind of nightly format that extends his audience to Stewart or Olbermann levels, but he certainly wields the influence of the paradox: he’s hilarious, but the astuteness of his “New Rules” segment sparks conversations after each of his Friday night shows.

It’s worth noting that Maher and Olbermann both criticized Jon Stewart’s Rally to Restore Sanity speech, wherein he suggested that both the left and the right share equally in political “insanity.” As Maher put it, Stewart’s argument “pretend[s] that the insanity is equally distributed in both parties.”

Especially in the wake of the Gabrielle Giffords shooting, the cries for “civility” have grown louder. It sounds good, but I fear this may result in Democrats appeasing ever more, while Republicans refuse to compromise an inch. They have a way of doing this. The New York Times reports today that Republicans had already started making the rounds on Sunday talk shows to undermine the arguments they anticipated Obama making in tomorrow’s State of the Union Address. As Maher puts it, “Republicans keep staking out a position that is further and further right, and then demand Democrats meet them in the middle, which is now not the middle anymore”—a position Olbermann echoed.

Jon Stewart’s ethos of equally-distributed culpability may continue to catch on with Democrats weary of incessant bickering. To be sure, he makes compelling points that are always spot-on and his magnanimous character is something to aspire to. But I think Democrats will find the other side won’t honor a truce flag if they stop fighting. Personally, I’d rather see the public turn to Bill Maher and stay embroiled in a fight for its values than follow Stewart’s call to lay down arms and get walked all over heading into the 2012 elections.

Tomorrow night’s State of the Union Address will give a pretty good indication of where the president is headed ideologically in this home stretch to the 2012 campaign. Where the public is headed ideologically is yet to be seen, but will surely take the form of whoever replaces Olbermann as the party’s go-to funny man.

  1. January 24, 2011 at 8:06 pm, Wap1102 said:

    Keith Olbermann is a flaming liberal and not very bright. I suspect he became an embarrassment to MSNBC and NBC. It is one thing to lean a little to the left but he was touching the floor. He was insulting and shallow, while trying to portray a superior, objective demeanor. MSNBC can certainly do better in his prime time slot . . . and if they are smart they will strive for a little balance like their nemesis, FoxNews.

    Reply

    • January 24, 2011 at 8:38 pm, GloriaVS1950 said:

      You have got to be kidding. There is so much meanness on the other side, Keith did not have a choice, really. He seldom made mistakes, and when he did, he apologized for them as soon as they were discovered by him. It appeared to me that he was trying to keep the misinformation from becoming accepted truth. He is to be applauded for his not giving in to the corporate bureaucracy.

      Reply

    • January 25, 2011 at 6:56 am, Seattleclockcompany said:

      Not very bright? You’re kidding, right? “strive for a little balance” HA! You think Glenn Beck is balanced? He’s a nut-case – a lying, SOB, ratings whore. And O’Reilly just makes shi_ up every night. And Keith doesn’t have to “portray a superior demeanor” – he is superior, far superior..

      And don’t compare the opinion hours with the news hours, it’s not the same thing.

      Reply

  2. January 24, 2011 at 10:08 pm, Anonymous said:

    Im pretty sure Jon was already ahead of Keith and has nothing to gain by leaving CC. I also don’t picture Maher leaving a place where he’s allowed to speak freely after he’s already had his issues with Disney. What does this channel have to offer that a big name would want?

    Reply

  3. January 24, 2011 at 11:39 pm, Tjsmith1017 said:

    I would be proud to see Keith run for office. Maybe it would overcome the shame I feel about the sell out of Evan Bye,

    Reply

  4. January 25, 2011 at 2:45 am, Annsierra39 said:

    No one can ever “REPLACE” Keith O. Doesn’t anyone remember what “CLASS” is???
    This guy has a lot of that and more. Keith O has a clean sharp mind he is clear and extremely intelligent. I don’t see him running for office with the crap he would have to go through and the idiots he would have to debate. We are soooooo careful not to be mean to the mean people who are frightened of our changing world and what we have to do to survive the upcoming events (whatever they are)

    Reply

  5. January 25, 2011 at 6:45 am, Seattleclockcompany said:

    You should have watched Lawrence O’Donnel tonight – best show he has ever done. He did a great tribute to Keith! Had on Bernie Sanders too! O’Donnel can never replace Keith, he knows that, but he will be a strong voice for liberals and if future shows are anything like tonight – you might want to tune in!

    Reply

  6. January 25, 2011 at 2:18 pm, Anonymous said:

    I’m not pleased at the fact that Olbermann is gone. I’m not pleased at the way he disappeared, though it seemed that was partially of his own choosing. But the MSNBC lineup is still incredibly strong and incredibly honest, and IMHO will serve the base incredibly well, even if Lawrence O’Donnell is the type of cat who can appreciate a joke more than he can tell one…
    My personal conspiracy theory was that Olbermann’s leaving was, perhaps, less about personality conflicts than it was about strategy. I’ll say up front, I know less than Jack did when he met Squat. But were I in charge of programming at MSNBC, I’d argue that O’Donnell is a better fit for 8 o’clock, more accessible, less inflammatory. Maddow’s got more of an edge that O’Donnell, and of course Olbermann has the most fire, and would be the perfect cap for the night. Think of it as a concert, KO would be the headliner.

    But in the world of cable news networks, no one believes that 10 is the “headline” spot, they believe 8 is the “anchor” spot, and people will keep tuned in the rest of the night. So if a decision was made to swap LO’s and KO’s time slots, KO saw it as being slighted and disrespected. And in a way, I can’t blame him, even though I wish he hadn’t felt that way and saw 10 as an opportunity to actually reach more people. Most networks don’t show comedies at 10, so people looking for a little humor with their info would be well served by KO’s style of commentary.

    So since KO was slighted by the lineup change, he amscrayed, LO was bumped up and the fiery pit-bull slot was filled by Schulz.

    I have no way of knowing if I’m right, it’s just a gut feeling. Nonetheless, when KO balked, I’m sure some of the new suits were happy to see him go, maybe even secretly hoping this would be the end result.

    Reply

  7. January 26, 2011 at 2:06 pm, PrimaryAl said:

    Keith’s hair is much nicer than Bill M’s, and John S is too intelligent and self aware to suitably replace Doberman. Oops….
    Anyway, the hair will get Keith nominated and he can then foul the air with angry/screwloose distortion rehoretic for years to come.

    Reply

  8. January 31, 2011 at 4:25 am, Lshafter said:

    Why would Jon Stewart want to be on a network that nobody watches

    Reply

  9. January 31, 2011 at 4:26 am, Lshafter said:

    For Bill Maher it would be a dramatic increase in ratings

    Reply

  10. January 31, 2011 at 4:44 am, Lshafter said:

    I love the commentary of Perpetually Enraged Liberals. I think this whole thing is an absolute hoot. They so embrace intelligence and their certainty that anyone who disagrees with their “hope and change” president is a blatant racist. Yes we can. Well you did. Now enjoy the ride.

    Reply

Add New Comment

Showing 12 comments
Subscribe by RSS