A little exploration into the 2012 GOP Collective Suicide Pact, colloquially know as the Paul Ryan budget proposal.
Somewhere huddled deep inside the White House catacombs are a group of hacks—otherwise known as President Obama’s political advisors—utterly oblivious to the state of American politics. They seem to believe that from gleaning several seasons of The West Wing they can derive a legitimate understanding of how to negotiate with a political party composed of a House Speaker whose closest bipedal ancestor is an oompa loompa, a former House Speaker who dumped his wife while she was recovering from cancer, a batshit crazy congresswoman from Minnesota, a Mormon who once strapped his dog to the roof of a car during a family trip, and a witch from Delaware.
By shuffling their feet and avoiding anything that remotely resembles a bold stance, the Obama Administration has allowed Paul “I hate poor people” Ryan to steal the limelight with a Very Serious and Very Bold economic plan.
Meanwhile, I’m having difficulty discerning which is more infuriating: a) the voodoo economics upon which Ryan’s plan is built; b) the amenable mainstream media legitimizing said plan; or c) congressional Democrats who apparently have derived their negotiating skills from Homer Simpson.
Let’s begin with the GOP’s economic suicide pact, colloquially known as the 2012 Republican budget proposal. I won’t even dwell on the fact that literally all the tax cuts in Ryan’s plan are directed at the wealthy. Forget, even, that this budget will actually increase the deficit over the next ten years.
Just take a step back and consider the big picture: The estimated cost of giving the wealthiest Americans a multi-trillion dollar windfall is just about equal to the proposed cuts in food stamps, Medicaid, and other programs targeted at low-income families. In a society where the top 400 families possess more wealth than the bottom 50%, the Ryan Express seeks to further magnify this vast disparity by scraping crumbs from the poor to subsidize the rich.
It’s hard to miss the laughable claims nestled in this perverted Robin Hood manifesto. First off, Ryan, citing none other than the Heritage Foundation, claims that not only will unemployment fall below 3% within ten years (a level witnessed once, briefly, during the Korean War), but healthcare and social security spending will plummet to 3.5% of GDP.
How will this happen? Why screwing over the poor and elderly, of course. Medicare will be replaced with a voucher program that recklessly caps the amount of money the federal government contributes to the care of its senior population. As Dean Baker notes, seniors will be forced to pay the vast majority of their medical expenses by themselves, and the poor will be hung out to dry with a gutted Medicaid program that shifts nearly all the financial burden to overstretched state payrolls.
The Ryan plan is fraud, plain and simple. Yet by fawning over just how Bold and Serious this “proposal” is, the media is legitimizing a hyper-conservative death sentence that will literally kill off the poor and elderly to underwrite massive tax cuts for the richest of the rich.
Yet the media neglects to report on the flagrant Republican hypocrisy with regard to Medicare. Remember the buildup to the midterm elections? Remember all the terrifying GOP advertisements warning seniors that Obama was going to detonate Medicare? Remember John Boehner exhorting that Obama’s “government takeover of health care would cut seniors’ Medicare benefits by $500 billion”? Remember the much-heralded Pledge to America which warned that the “new health care law’s massive Medicare cuts will fall squarely on the backs of seniors”?
Instead of casually noting how fucking insane the Republican demands are, Obama, in his quest to make every last person in the world love him, has refused to demonstrate anything remotely resembling leadership. Channeling his inner Neville Chamberlain, Obama thoroughly appeased Republicans before they even began holding the United States hostage with a shutdown. After acquiescing to nearly every GOP demand, Democrats declared victory after “saving” Planned Parenthood by agreeing to yet more spending cuts that will further derail an already sputtering economic recovery.
Somewhere, just maybe, Obama has an agenda that hasn’t been tainted by the austerity myth currently being peddled by the Tea Party and their Republican enablers. Sadly, he has wasted literally every opportunity to define the debate, punting instead to a complaisant media and Paul Ryan’s Very Serious, Very Bold prescription for economic suicide.





April 11, 2011 at 7:52 pm, charity said:
I couldn’t agree more!
April 11, 2011 at 8:27 pm, Ben Snyder said:
Don’t you get it? In a truly meritocratic society the rich should be rewarded for their success. If the government doesn’t reward them, why would they ever become rich? Never mind wealth condensation, or aggregate demand, or gini coefficients, all that is boring sciencey stuff for dweebs. Real Americans know that the rich are supposed to gobble up all the resources, and the common folk get the live of the crumbs they drop. Ryan’s plan actually adds a safety net in the sense that it catches those falling crumbs so the rich can hang onto them. This way the poor become really poor, and will just have more encouragement and drive to become rich. Everybody wins!
April 11, 2011 at 11:12 pm, Misperanzo said:
Ben, good f ing post, just a good post.
April 12, 2011 at 4:58 pm, Eddy said:
Don’t YOU get it? How do the rich become rich in this country? Certainly there are far more people who have gone from poor to rich in THIS country than in any other. All you have to do is look at sports and entertainment for a huge number of examples. How do the poor get employed? How is it that on average the government pays 40% more to public workers than private workers make from their employer? That is on top of ridiculously generous benefits. For those of us who struggle financially and work hard for what we have, we don’t need self loathing rich kids like you telling us how to live. I am employed by “rich” not “poor” people and I appreciate the jobs I have had. I am also a small business owner that is struggling and required to pay ridiculous amounts to this bloated government because people like you don’t have a clue what you are talking about financially. You only have your ideology to guide you and you think you are doing something good for the “poor”. I live in CA where Democrats have had vast majorities for many years in our state legislature. They keep taking more in taxes and spending more but have nothing to show for it. Get a grip on reality and come to terms with your self loathing without draggin the rest of us into it.
April 12, 2011 at 6:03 pm, NB said:
Your 40% figure is epically wrong. Low-paying positions like janitors, yes, receive more generous pay in the public sector. For jobs requiring a college degree, private sector workers earn substantially more.
It’s a testament to how shitty the job market is that public benefits are greater than private. This has not always been the case. Many new jobs offer crap health care and no paid vacations.
And now you simply resent public sector unions. Focus your anger on the people pulling your strings, pal.
April 14, 2011 at 3:38 am, Eddy said:
I have done a lot of work with government workers and agencies and I have first hand knowledge of the corruption and ridiculous compensation they receive for mediocre performance. This is not always the case, just most of the time. If you look at the following link, 40% more is low here in the Pacific region. This is before the corrupt unions confiscate their share.
http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/pension-crisis/public-employee-pension-crisis/chart-graph/average-total-compensation-statelocal-employees-vs-private-sec
Average numbers take everybody into account and, you are epically wrong, college educated makes little difference comparing apples to apples, public sector still make more on average.
I quote the ultra-liberal Willie Brown here in California who supports pension reform and said the problem IS the PS unions (who I have always resented because there is no place for collective bargaining as a public employee, they work for us.) They are the “political reprisals” reference in his quote.
“The pension reform effort in San Francisco, led by Jeff Adachi, the city public defender, “needs to be supported,” Brown said in an interview. “There is almost no one else in politics willing to undertake dialogue on this issue, for fear of political reprisals.”
Just so we are clear, I have no problem forming my own thoughts and opinions, there are no strings attached to me.
April 14, 2011 at 3:38 am, Eddy said:
I have done a lot of work with government workers and agencies and I have first hand knowledge of the corruption and ridiculous compensation they receive for mediocre performance. This is not always the case, just most of the time. If you look at the following link, 40% more is low here in the Pacific region. This is before the corrupt unions confiscate their share.
http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/pension-crisis/public-employee-pension-crisis/chart-graph/average-total-compensation-statelocal-employees-vs-private-sec
Average numbers take everybody into account and, you are epically wrong, college educated makes little difference comparing apples to apples, public sector still make more on average.
I quote the ultra-liberal Willie Brown here in California who supports pension reform and said the problem IS the PS unions (who I have always resented because there is no place for collective bargaining as a public employee, they work for us.) They are the “political reprisals” reference in his quote.
“The pension reform effort in San Francisco, led by Jeff Adachi, the city public defender, “needs to be supported,” Brown said in an interview. “There is almost no one else in politics willing to undertake dialogue on this issue, for fear of political reprisals.”
Just so we are clear, I have no problem forming my own thoughts and opinions, there are no strings attached to me.
April 12, 2011 at 2:43 am, KJ said:
It’s real funny how the Libs can write this just after SPENDING more money than we will ever take in and say this is going tooo far? You people had better listen up and pay attention: WE Have to pay for what you Libs took only 2 years to outspend any administration EVER!!!!!
Someone is going to have to make up for it….I know you believe they can just keep making money and not back it up….biggest retarded belief ever morons!!!
April 12, 2011 at 12:52 pm, Misperanzo said:
I agree with you about the spending debacle over the past two years, and I am a republican, however, you actually have to read the spending bill or at least portions of it. I don’t believe any entitlement plan should off the table for cuts, but these are the cuts that we fought against during the obama campaign. It’s crazy to now embrace them. Paul Ryan is a touch crazy just like the tea party, we do need them though to get things moving, lets just stay rational.
April 12, 2011 at 3:18 pm, Anonymous said:
Many more Americans may need the following tips for Living in their cars!
http://www.e-forwards.com/2011/04/tips-for-living-in-your-car-in-these-shocking-times/
April 12, 2011 at 5:06 pm, Uncle Squidward said:
Full of charged exaggerations and misspellings, this article has very little, if any, content at all. You might as well just put your thumbs in your ears, and stick your tongue out.
April 12, 2011 at 5:48 pm, Nlbromley said:
How about you provide an example? And what misspellings?
April 12, 2011 at 6:54 pm, john charles webb jr said:
Obama, in his quest to make every last person in the world love him, has refused to demonstrate anything remotely resembling leadership. <<< end quote from article
I agree Nicholas . . . . Obama has never 'graduated' from being a Senator (hand holding and heavy petting) to becoming The President he promised us he would be :
I feel 'deserted' .
April 12, 2011 at 6:54 pm, john charles webb jr said:
Obama, in his quest to make every last person in the world love him, has refused to demonstrate anything remotely resembling leadership. <<< end quote from article
I agree Nicholas . . . . Obama has never 'graduated' from being a Senator (hand holding and heavy petting) to becoming The President he promised us he would be :
I feel 'deserted' .
April 15, 2011 at 1:59 am, sylvia said:
no misspellings. nice work NB
April 15, 2011 at 1:59 am, sylvia said:
no misspellings. nice work NB