A new set of WikiLeaks documents reveals the United States is just as paranoid as Fox News.
The latest WikiLeaks exposé is dedicated to the decade-old Guantanamo Bay. It’s closure was once a campaign platform for the progressive president-elect Barack Obama, but the WikiLeaks documents explain the prison in starker terms.
Guantanamo Bay is the official torture-friendly establishment of the United States, not so much a stain on our past but an emblem of our future. It represents the deep-seeded paranoia and general hypocrisy that governs our daily lives and empowers our government.
The New York Times article today focusses on several points brought to light by the leaks, from the treatment of 9/11 mastermind KSM to the role of foreign officials in Guantanamo affairs. However the most disturbing selection from the leaks concerns Al-Jazeera camera man Sami al-Hajj.
Al-Hajj, who is Sudanese, was detained in Guantanamo for six years. He underwent questioning that involved Al-Jazeera‘s “training program, telecommunications equipment, and newsgathering operations in Chechnya, Kosovo, and Afghanistan.” Al-Jazeera is a television network and website.
This is exactly the type of warped information Glenn Beck has profited from. It’s how he built his extraordinary brand. Beck has described Al-Jazeera as a propaganda machine. He says what they say in English is different from what they say in Arabic (duh) and enthusiastically relays how when the outlet polled its audience on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 asking if they supported Osama bin Laden, 50 percent said yes.
So what? Journalism is disinterested truth. I’m sure it makes the editors of the Wall Street Journal want to squirm when they report Donald Trump is leading or trailing slightly in Republican polls. But that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t publish it.
And to what type of “training program” are the leaks referring? The one where the Al-Jazeera interns retrieve coffee for their editors, and the fastest one gets to write an article someday? Scan the front page of Al-Jazeera today and you’ll see an Op-ed by Tony Blair on the fight against malaria.
Still, al-Hajj’s file says he was an al-Qaeda member who worked as a military mule couriering money and weapons. Upon his release, al-Hajj was rehired by Al-Jazeera. I suppose that makes them a terrorist network, literally and figuratively.
Both myself and Death and Taxes political columnist Andrew Belonsky have conducted video interviews for Al-Jazeera on U.S. politics, mostly on how the populous came to believe what they believe about Barack Obama or how particular policies effect segments of U.S. culture.
Perhaps Al-Jazeera should conduct a series of interviews with the U.S. youth examining their thoughts on Guantanamo Bay. It might be eye-opening for the government to see what we really think terrorism is.





April 25, 2011 at 7:39 pm, Anonymous said:
What the hell are you talking about? Good lord!
April 25, 2011 at 7:39 pm, Anonymous said:
What the hell are you talking about? Good lord!
April 25, 2011 at 7:39 pm, Anonymous said:
What the hell are you talking about? Good lord!
April 25, 2011 at 7:39 pm, Anonymous said:
What the hell are you talking about? Good lord!
April 25, 2011 at 7:44 pm, Stum360 said:
This article makes no sense…
April 25, 2011 at 7:45 pm, Topperhansen said:
can y get a paper copy of this sent to my home i am out of toilet paper
April 25, 2011 at 7:46 pm, Anon said:
Incoherent blather. Learn to write, man.
April 25, 2011 at 7:46 pm, Anon said:
Incoherent blather. Learn to write, man.
April 25, 2011 at 7:48 pm, Ray said:
This is the most stupid article I have read in a long long time.
April 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm, EljayBird said:
Your writing would be more credible if you learn the difference between the words “affect”, and “effect” and refrain from using words such as “duh”.
April 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm, EljayBird said:
Your writing would be more credible if you learn the difference between the words “affect”, and “effect” and refrain from using words such as “duh”.
April 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm, EljayBird said:
Your writing would be more credible if you learn the difference between the words “affect”, and “effect” and refrain from using words such as “duh”.
April 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm, EljayBird said:
Your writing would be more credible if you learn the difference between the words “affect”, and “effect” and refrain from using words such as “duh”.
April 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm, EljayBird said:
Your writing would be more credible if you learn the difference between the words “affect”, and “effect” and refrain from using words such as “duh”.
April 25, 2011 at 7:51 pm, Ks said:
*populace
April 25, 2011 at 7:52 pm, Cindy said:
You know, I thought this was a serious news article until I saw the multiple mis-spelled words. That’s always a tip-off for me to stay as far away as possiible from uninformed and narrow-minded opinions such as those stated in this “article.”
April 25, 2011 at 7:54 pm, Stephen B Lackey said:
“interviews with the U.S. youth”??? Who gives a rats-ass what the uninformed think?
This article is a sales pitch for Al-Jazeera.
April 25, 2011 at 7:54 pm, Stephen B Lackey said:
“interviews with the U.S. youth”??? Who gives a rats-ass what the uninformed think?
This article is a sales pitch for Al-Jazeera.
April 25, 2011 at 7:54 pm, Stephen B Lackey said:
“interviews with the U.S. youth”??? Who gives a rats-ass what the uninformed think?
This article is a sales pitch for Al-Jazeera.
April 25, 2011 at 7:59 pm, LarryB said:
Those who believe our elected officials should have no accountability must be the ones who hate WikiLeaks.
April 25, 2011 at 7:59 pm, LarryB said:
Those who believe our elected officials should have no accountability must be the ones who hate WikiLeaks.
April 27, 2011 at 10:25 pm, Anonymous said:
Larry? LARRY! When have you EVER seen anyone say “I believe our elected officials should have no accountability”? Look, you seem like a decent enough guy, but I’m not sure that I want you on my team.
April 25, 2011 at 8:00 pm, Kimbo66 said:
And this guy gets pay for writing this nonsense. WOW
April 25, 2011 at 8:00 pm, Kimbo66 said:
And this guy gets pay for writing this nonsense. WOW
April 25, 2011 at 8:00 pm, Joseph F Ziolkowski said:
Loser writer….
April 25, 2011 at 8:03 pm, Mr2kuhl said:
Wow, what a bunch of useless information. There is suppose to be information in a news story right? Can you at least use some of your proceeds to take some adult educational classes. I can see why Google points to this article, to make it look like the boys at Gitmo are doing there jobs.
April 28, 2011 at 12:32 am, Kumomichi said:
‘there vs. their…. educational classes all round, no?
April 25, 2011 at 8:11 pm, Anonymous said:
I’d rather be paranoid & prepared than naive & complacent. I’ve worked near DC in a warehouse expediting medical vehicles to Afg. Large fleets of ambulances were all stocked since the 1980′s to prepare for a possible nuclear attack (i.e. ‘The Day After’ scenario). I felt so proud of our government to see a clear level of preparation. Besides, your hero Obama is keeping Gitmo indefinitely anyway, so you’re simply poking one person and blaming all the witnesses for it.
April 25, 2011 at 8:26 pm, Anonymous said:
It seems like every time I see someone with an opinion responding. I tend to find a student seeking a non-science degree at other than his own expense (taxpayer perhaps). Or is working for or seeking to work for an eleemosynary outfit with a political attitude wishing to get paid big bucks. I also often tend to sees someone who describes what Fox News is providing, & how much they dislike what they are hearing. Now why would they listen to something they claim to find so much imperfection with ? Would a normal person do that ? I think not so why ? Perhaps they are getting paid to do so ? After-all they claim only the ill informed listen to Fox News. If any of you bright guys who listen to Fox News have any other reason for all this Fox News listening that makes you ill … please advise some reasons for such supercilious behavior & why you have so much time to spend doing what you dislike so much
May 03, 2011 at 7:38 pm, mamabear said:
you can’t debate the “other” side without knowing what they are saying.
April 26, 2011 at 4:57 am, Anonymous said:
The article states that “Journalism is disinterested truth”. Maybe in a perfect world it is, but certainly not in America’s MSM much less Al-Jazeera and definitely not in this article.
April 26, 2011 at 6:09 pm, john charles webb jr said:
Any alleged ‘terror’
…………. becomes victorious
………. if it prompts us to ‘trash our foundations’
(our constitutional rights) :
April 26, 2011 at 6:12 pm, john charles webb jr said:
the REAL PROBLEM
is that we don’s “END ANY FUKIN’ THING”
INSTEAD …. WE TURN IT INTO A FRIGGIN’ BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY :
April 26, 2011 at 6:18 pm, john charles webb jr said:
A summary of Guantánamo Bay statistics, accurate as of January 17th 2011.
http://www.reprieve.org.uk/guantanamostats
Guantanamo is a bullshit factory , used to justify the fake-war-on-terror :
let’s interview some of the real-former residents :
HOW ABOUT THE 9 ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATORS ?
April 26, 2011 at 6:22 pm, john charles webb jr said:
can we hmmmmmmm ‘interview’
the innocent who died under C.I.A. interrogations ?
how about their names ?
can we have their names ?
we are all hostages :
April 26, 2011 at 6:25 pm, john charles webb jr said:
“NATIONAL SECURITY”
is the band.aide covering the cancer that is eating the spirit of America :
April 26, 2011 at 6:25 pm, john charles webb jr said:
“NATIONAL SECURITY”
is the band.aide covering the cancer that is eating the spirit of America :
April 26, 2011 at 6:29 pm, john charles webb jr said:
“NATIONAL SECURITY”
………. is the name of THE SLAVE SHIP
……… IN WHICH ERIC HOLDER (ATTORNEY GENERAL) IS CHAINED BY CENTRAL :
April 26, 2011 at 7:59 pm, Fhhh said:
you suck at writing
April 28, 2011 at 4:14 pm, desicant said:
I think the article is trying to make several points – maybe I’m not as close a reader as these other folks (who suddenly spring up like so much instantaneous grass and in such even uniformity that one wonders if maybe they are really natural grass at all) but it seems to me to be like so:
1) Guantanamo is the result of paranoia.
2) The paranoia is so bad that the government is loosing it’s grasp on reality
a. Evidence of this is that an Al-Jazeera journalism, al-Hajj, was held for 6 years under suspicion of being a terrorist.
3) Al-Jazeera, and its’ journalists, are unlikely to be terrorists or a propaganda machine.
a. Evidence of this can be seen in how they report news (such as Tony Blair).
b. The tenuous claims of “training programs” highlights how disconnected from reality the paranoid elements of our government are.
4) The paranoid atmosphere of our government is like the paranoid world view of Glenn Beck.
a. This is worrisome if your subjective feelings about Beck are that he is insane or purposefully distracting from fixing the real problems, see #2 above. (clearly if you think Beck is OK then this is not something you would feel upset about.)
5) In closing the author suggests a parallel dialog with Al-Jazeera be made wherein they interview American youth. This is a parallel since our government may become aware of our feelings on Guantanamo – just as we have become aware of theirs.
If you had trouble with this article try reading it again but going a little slower or taking notes as you go along. I find this works wonders when you are beginning to think critically about things but still haven’t internalized it yet.