Two things to consider: Protest is criminalized and it was done so with “Minority Report”-style pre-crime maneuvers.
Charlie Veitch was none too subtle. After the London TUC protests on March 26th, Veitch and his group the Love Police announced that they would launch “Disruption Spectacular” at Prince William’s Wedding.
It should be known that Veitch and the Love Police are non-violent protesters, many of them (including Veitch) being anarchists, and the “Disruption Spectacular” rhetoric was delivered in the spirit of the Diggers or Abbie Hoffman and the Yippies, and was not made in the same vein as violent protests in North Africa and the Middle East.
Veitch became an anti-Royalist and anarchist after being made redundant at his banking job, which forced him to reassess both his life, as well as the political and economic circumstances of both London and the world-at-large. Thus, when the Love Police announced their intention to spectacularly protest Prince William’s wedding, it was a symbolic action to demonstrate against royal opulence in the face of forced austerity which triggered the TUC protests.
In an attempt to prevent Veitch and the Love Police from protesting, London Police came to his flat and placed him under arrest for “suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance,” as well as “suspicion of aggravated trespass at Fortnum & Mason.”
Veitch’s girlfriend managed to tape the entire exchange with the arresting officers, in which Veitch asks, “is it okay if I bring a novel?” The officer demurs and says, “Um… I don’t think so, no. We have reading material at the station.” Veitch, in a humorous reposte, says, “Yeah, I’ll bring a couple of books.”
If you’re going to be jailed, why not entertain yourself with some fiction. To quote the arresting officer, “Lovely.”
If this can happen in London, it can happen anywhere, including America. And as humorous as some of Veitch’s comments and actions are in the arrest video, remember that his right to free speech was violated to silence his political views, always expressed through street theater and never violent.
And, honestly, I almost feel bad for the primary arresting officer. He seems polite enough and a good listener. One can even sense the vague recognition that he is arresting one of his own, and doing it on behalf of the powerful and elite (and on behalf of a royal family that doesn’t give the slightest fuck about his own existence).
Another bit of humor—Veitch can be heard brushing his teeth, then comes out and starts talking with a mouthful of toothpaste. In addressing the arresting officer statement about the trespassing at Fortnum & Mason’s, Veitch says, “They got nothing on me. The police asked us to leave Fortnum & Mason’s. We left. They got nothing on me.”
Imagine how the world could be if the working class police didn’t do the bidding of the politically powerful and rich.





May 05, 2011 at 3:57 pm, Mark_gullick said:
Charlie Veitch strikes me, after some casual Googling, as a front-of-the-queue tosser but, to paraphrase Voltaire, you may be a tosser, but I’ll defend your right to be one. The police, however, are not the working class anymore, but minor courtiers to the political class, the new princelings of our decadent little principality. The name Love Police, incidentally, reeks of too much E and nightclubs. I wonder which novel Veitch took to the nick. Something brutal and South American, I hope.
May 30, 2011 at 6:04 am, Jane Cartwright said:
Do you have ANY idea how much money the Royal Family bring into the UK….just by being the “Royal Family”??? Oh, silly me…..you’re probably against “money” too, right? So, what EXACTLY, would you say to those employees of hotels, retaurants, livestock farmers (who supply the hotels & restaurants), shops (think of the range of products THEY sell), photographers, manufacturers (and sellers) of memorabilia, road sweepers, news channels, etc., etc. (and there are a LOT of “etceteras” – think about it…just for a minute)? If YOU had the power/right to stop the ”Pomp & Ceremony” of the Royal Wedding (and soooooo many people were uplifted by it),….what would YOU say to those people (whether entrepreneurs or employees-of), who have children to raise/bills to pay? What about the future income generated by tourism off the back of the Royal Wedding??? ”Oh, sorry – I personally don’t agree with this, therefore you hundreds of thousands of people will just have to suffer the financial consequences”????? “Oh – and NO, I CAN’T personally make good your financial losses because of MY (and a minority of other’s) mis-guided views”?? It’s time people like you woke up – smelled the roses – let the air flow through your foggy brains, and got a job (or be an entrepreneur), ….inspire/help others to “better” themselves (trust me, there’s NOTHING to beat the feeling of giving a helping hand to someone in order that THEY can make a REAL/HUGE difference to their family’s lives)….instead of expecting everyone/ANYONE, else to support you! You are a twit and a buffoon, Charlie “Plonker-Veitch” – just because YOU are obviously not able/never will be, an entrepreneur…..why should everyone else suffer? …..You really ARE the weakest link I have ever seen….GOODBYE Plonker-Veitch!! LOLOL ….OUR Royal family ROCK!!!!!
June 25, 2012 at 12:36 pm, Anonymous and Occupy must stress peaceful protest at 2012 London Olympics | Death and Taxes said:
[...] Pangburn 1 min agoLast year there were rumblings from London that UK groups like UK Uncut, Occupy, The Love Police and Anonymous would protest the 2012 London Olympics. Now it seems that Occupy London, Anonymous [...]
June 25, 2012 at 2:54 pm, Anonymous and Occupy must stress peaceful protest at 2012 … » Eye On Occupy said:
[...] comments Last year there were rumblings from London that UK groups like UK Uncut, Occupy, The Love Police and Anonymous would protest the 2012 London Olympics. Now it seems that Occupy London, Anonymous [...]