News

Gay Activist Glitters Gingrich, Making Protests Fabulous Again (Video)

Gay activist Robert Erickson* showered Newt Gingrich with glitter during a book signing at the Minnesota Family Council event last night. Finally, gay protests are fierce once again!

Minneapolis-based Erickson’s protest came in response to Republican presidential candidate Gingrich’s recently inflamed anti-gay politics, including his desperate courting of the nefariously homophobic Minnesota Family Council.

That particular group, part of the larger social conservative brood, claims that Gay-Straight Alliances “indoctrinate” youth with a “homosexual agenda” that leads to an “unhealthy lifestyle,” according to MFC president Tom Prichard.

As for Gingrich — who has a lesbian half-sister — he said in 2008, “I think there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us, is prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can
get control of it. I think that it is a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion.”

Good thing Erickson used glitter instead of water. Gingrich may have melted.

During the demonstration, Erickson shouted, “Feel the rainbow, Newt! Stop the hate! Stop anti-gay politics! It’s dividing the country and it’s not fixing the economy.”

Gingrich, sounding like a political pro for the first time all week, later commented, “Nice to live in a free country,” while the MFC security guard — goon? — who ejected Erickson channeled Robert Mitchum’s character in ‘The Night of the Hunter,’ telling the activist, “So goes you [gays], goes the rotting of the country.”

As someone with vast experience on the subject of gay, I can say that’s not the case. I can also say that Erickson’s demonstration — and message — are fabulous! And inject some much-needed entertainment into LGBT protests, too.

The most recent high-profile LGBT protest was when former Army LT. Dan Choi hand-cuffing himself to the White House gates to push Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’s repeal. There have been other protests in recent months, to be sure — New Yorkers rallied for nuptial equality just last weekend — but none have been as headline-grabbing as Choi’s. His was effective and dramatic and totally worthy of respect. But it was also so stoic and Spartan, lacking in oomph.

Erickson, sure to be an an instant darling among the LGBT activist set,** reintroduced spectacle into the typical political theatrics. “Feel the rainbow!”? That’s a catchy, memorable opener that leads into a valid, succinct argument: anti-gay politics divide this country and don’t fix the economy.

His was a far more dynamic approach than Choi’s or a comparably run-of-the-mill march, recalling the dynamism of ACT-UP’s early HIV/AIDS activism.

ACT-UP’s members enacted the most sensational and compelling of all gay protests: in 1987, they sprawled out at the intersection of Wall Street and Broadway to demand more access to newly developed AIDS drugs, and that same year hung their famous “Silence Equals Death” banner in front of Ronald Reagan’s White House. Seventeen years later, ten nude ACT-UP activists protested the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York.

Though some of the group’s protests were grim, they all effectively employed a blithe spirit, catapulting them onto front pages around the nation, and the world. So too has Erickson’s stunt, which will hopefully inspire more imaginative and playful protests that capture the nation’s attention.

In a week full of Gingrich-related hubbubs — his gaffe about Obama being a “food-stamp president,” the Republican’s outrageous Tiffany bill and Medicare comments that resulted in Gingrich being balled out by an irate Iowan — Erickson’s action will stand out. And for good reason.

*”Robert Erickson” appears to be left-leaning activist Nick Espinosa’s nom de guerre.

Update: I was right. My pal Phil Reese has already interviewed Erickson/Espinosa for the ‘Washington Blade.’ Check it out.

  1. May 18, 2011 at 3:05 pm, Carlee Holzhalb said:

    This IS fabulous.

    Reply

    • May 18, 2011 at 5:50 pm, rick said:

      Again, if this had been a straight person doing this to a gay person, this would have been considered a hate crime. How is this not the same, and why isn’t this guy hauled off to jail on hate crime charges as well as assault? Shameful, wrong, and NOBODY should find this to be okay.

      Reply

      • May 18, 2011 at 8:12 pm, Just said:

        Excuse me but I think you have your facts mixed up. A hate crime is defined as “a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving violence.” No violence was involved in this protest, in fact no crime was committed other than a small disturbance that was resolved without the police being involved.
        Even if it had been a straight person throwing the glitter, or anything else that would not cause physical injury, it would still not be considered a hate crime. It would be a simple protest, just like this one.

        Reply

  2. May 18, 2011 at 4:12 pm, PolishBear said:

    Newt Gingrich is almost as much of a laughing-stock as Donald Trump. But if the Republicans DO end up going off the deep end and nominating him for President, it will be very interesting to hear how he addresses Gay Americans in debates with Barack Obama.

    He claims he is for “traditional marriage.” I want to ask him how allowing law-abiding, taxpaying Gay couples the same legal benefits that Straight couples have always taken for granted will affect anyone’s “traditional marriage.”

    He says he supports the Defense of Marriage Act. I want to ask him how DOMA is possibly justifiable under the 14th Amendment and the ”Full Faith & Credit” clause.

    He says childen need a mother and a father. I want to ask him if he will prohibit single people and unmarried couples from adopting children, and whether he will deny marriage licenses to couples who either can’t or have no desire to have children.

    He says marriage is “sacred.” I want to ask him when the United States became a theocracy … because it is not the purpose of government, nor of the Constitution, to make things “sacred.” 

    Reply

    • May 18, 2011 at 5:50 pm, rick said:

      If this had been a straight person doing this to a gay person, this would have been considered a hate crime. How is this not the same, and why isn’t this guy hauled off to jail on hate crime charges as well as assault? Shameful, wrong, and NOBODY should find this to be okay.

      Reply

  3. May 18, 2011 at 8:32 pm, Bcreative said:

    This action is the liberal version of Fox “News.”  If you dislike a Republican, please figure a better way to communicate.  This crap is meaningless.  It does nothing for whatever cause or statement this guy was trying to make.  Hurts it actually.  Who knows what he was trying to say.  That’s the problem.  It says nothing people can relate to and only makes most viewers feel for the victim – the absolute last thing you want to do.  If you’re gay, you can thank this jerk for making your lobby look childish.  I’m still trying to figure out why terrorists blow things up.  That says nothing either.     

    Reply

  4. May 18, 2011 at 10:50 pm, john charles webb jr said:

    maybe , next time , a ‘bitch-slap’ ? if the pixie dust did not work .  
    they start with ‘glitter’ and then wind up trying to fu*k you in the arse . . . . . 
    maybe Gingrich will not need to proceed to level 2 : 
    :-)

    Reply

  5. May 19, 2011 at 10:07 pm, Outstanding Andrea Garcia said:

     Peace be with you…YODA

    Reply

  6. May 19, 2011 at 10:07 pm, Outstanding Andrea Garcia said:

     Peace be with you…YODA

    Reply

  7. May 19, 2011 at 10:07 pm, Outstanding Andrea Garcia said:

     Peace be with you…YODA

    Reply

  8. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  9. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  10. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  11. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  12. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  13. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  14. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  15. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  16. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  17. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  18. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  19. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  20. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  21. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  22. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  23. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  24. May 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm, Phil Reese said:

     Thanks for posting!

    Reply

  25. February 15, 2012 at 11:41 am, Candidates using secret service to demonize Occupy, gay activists | Death and Taxes said:

    [...] the presidential candidate, leading to two arrests during the event and one after, when someone “glitterbombed” the socially conservative, anti-gay White House hopeful. During the event, Santorum went out of his [...]

    Reply

Add New Comment

Showing 28 comments
Subscribe by RSS