Death and Taxes’ coverage of Occupy Wall Street.
One must walk through an ocean of tourists congregating around the 9/11 memorial site, heads craned up into the atmosphere, slack-jawed, staring at Freedom Tour the WTC ashes to get to the occupation. Police are everywhere. Stationed at the construction site, the Federal Reserve and now the Occupy Wall Street zone.
Everything is orderly. Various assemblies have sprouted up. Socialists are recruiting. Individuals are filming, interviewing and recording audio, others are handing out fliers. Veteran sympathesizers are out to offer their support. An old, grizzled man wearing spectacles and carrying a red flag stomps around the grounds crying, “This is all the Left can do—talk! We have a golden opportunity here to act.” Too crazy or perhaps too right to be an agent provocateur. If he’s an agent and trying to incite the crowd, the man is in deep, deep cover—so far down the rabbit hole that he won’t be finding his way out anytime soon.
A gaggle of gutter punks, bohemians, face-painted hipsters and ’60s hippies hoping to revive the dream or maybe to see just how far it has faded. The police have formed a perimeter and were perfectly reserved and non-combative. Very strange, indeed.
Various individuals donning Anonymous masks, both on and off, stalk the grounds. One even spoke, though he seemed not to be offering ideas but ranting at someone in one of the assemblies.
My first impression of the occupation as a whole was that of, “Hey, quite a lot of white college and post-college students sitting about,” pontificating on the usual matters, most especially corporate personhood. An important issue, no doubt; but apart from that storyline, ideas are short here. At least half of what is being said is a regurgitation.
The overwhelming impression is of echoes upon echoes of what is wrong, but few prescriptions for what to do about it—very few constructive ideas. One young man suggested the first step should be to take the issue of corporate personhood all the way up to the Supreme Court, but failed to state how this might be accomplished.
Others are clearly more intelligent and have thought a great deal about how a future world might be molded out of the crumbling present. But most protesters hardly represent the various strata of American citizenry. This anti-Wall Street, crony capitalist sentiment needs to bring a more a complete representative cross-section to bear on culture: scientists, businessman, workers and various others from the middle and lower classes who’ve been blanked out of existence—not just the counterculture.
Despite these criticisms, there were more promising moments.
For instance, one activist, using a megaphone, spoke about how there is more than enough food and housing to feed and shelter everyone in this country. He, of course, was not the one railing ad infinitum about corporate personhood. Another individual suggested that when Occupy Wall Street had run its course, everyone in attendance should return to their communities to implement new ideas in a constructive way.
These individuals were idea men, creative thinkers; and this is what the occupation needs.
If everyone had come with one constructive, workable and achievable idea, there would be a sense of momentum. As it stands, the momentum is rather minimal or tentative. People are excited and unsure about what to do or where things will go with the occupation, but this is to be expected.
As one protester noted, “A lot of us don’t know where to go, but this is just the stepping stone—this is just the beginning. This is why we need to have the discussions.”
But it was his next thought that was the most practically useful—a thought that I have championed here at Death and Taxes quite often: that banks only have power because we give them our money. We should instead turn to credit unions for our banking needs. The protester expressed a similar sentiment in saying, “Our actions do count, especially at a local level. A lot of these financial organizations do depend on our money in their systems to grow. So, say for instance we had a mass exodus away from a lot of the big banks, then that’s all it’s going to take to bring them down.”
Ambitious? Yes, but that’s no reason not to convince at least a few people per day that they should bank with a credit union instead of with Chase, Bank of America or Wells Fargo. (Read my article “5 Reasons to Put Your Money in a Credit Union” to better understand the advantages of credit unions versus big banks.)
A protester named Ketchup, who flew in from Chicago, decked out in a nice yellow dress with red spectacles, had a rather commanding voice but only offered her support of those comments that came before hers. One had the impression that she might have had other ideas to express but she, like many others, was adjusting to the idea of a spontaneous assembly—the idea that no one should dictate but operate democratically.
We shall see where it goes.
Stay tuned for more updates on Occupy Wall Street.






September 17, 2011 at 11:10 pm, OrchestratedPulse said:
I’m on my way to the occupation, but as I try to justify my actions to family and friends I realized that we need an accessible frame for non-participants to grasp. After a few hours, I think that our occupation needs a ransom. Financial speculation in oil is the main reason for the high cost of gas, costly gas in turn makes everything more expensive. If we demand that Wall St stop with the “paper oil” then we can give a tangible benefit to everyone. This would Bea start. I love your ideas and hopefully I will see y’all soon!
September 18, 2011 at 12:19 am, lyris said:
They had to right ideas in the late 1960′s and early 1970′s.
September 18, 2011 at 12:54 am, Nojunk_3 said:
The protest movement started in the late 50′s and was over in the early 70′s.
September 18, 2011 at 2:54 am, Dan said:
In a translation of the Tao Te Ching by Stephen Mitchell, number 53 is a very good reason to occupy Wall Street. If that copy is not available, get translations until it makes sense to you.
September 18, 2011 at 3:05 am, Mysterysouppe said:
Somebody should take it upon himself or herself to get everyone’s email address. I’m sure this is being done. Isn’t it?
September 18, 2011 at 9:09 am, Herbivore said:
You sound like such a hipster writing this piece from an social aesthetic perspective. Do you honestly think a huge crowd of angry protesters each need to come with an original plan to validate this movement in your eyes? What about intense anger towards a system that has marginalized us for far too long?
You come across as such a troll as you reduce the breadth of what is being expressed here into a few reductionist strawman caricatures “hippies, hipsters, gutterpunks, bohemians, a lot of post-college students sitting about pontificating on the usual matters”
You could have easily used most of these words to describe the participants of any civil rights movement. Here’s a tip: spend a little more time assessing the language and spirit of the movement rather than a detailed description of every subjects attire and hip-rating.
September 18, 2011 at 3:33 pm, D. J. said:
You’re entitled to your opinion, of course; both about me (ad hominem though it is) and my observations, I felt very much that this article was constructive criticism. Apparently you only saw criticism, and that probably says more about you than me.
I spent an entire day listening to what was being said at the occupation and much of it was re-hashed ideas and sound bites—not all of it, but much of it. More particularly, a lot of it reminded me of the sound bites that have been around since the ’60s (though I wasn’t alive at the time). I quite enjoyed it when certain of the speakers in the assemblies had constructive ideas instead of just saying, “It’s the corporations, it’s the corporations.” Well, yes, it is; but we all know that. What else have you got? If this is your complaint with my coverage, then I’m willing to accept that, though I think many of our readers would agree with me on this point.Sure I’m angry. We’re all angry. But my argument in this piece was that others—cutting across various social, economic and other strata—need to be involved. Yes, it has to start somewhere, and maybe it’s at the occupation or maybe it isn’t.However, It will be a success when mechanics, scientists, lawyers, doctors, shop owners, etc., and people of various ethnicities and social backgrounds are there to really bring a new dynamic.Or it can remain what it is.
September 18, 2011 at 3:37 pm, D. J. said:
And, yes… I do think that a movement against the corpocratic system needs ideas. It needs an abundance of ideas, not regurgitation.
The protesters even sensed it themselves intuitively: mostly, each one who spoke would echo the ones before him or her, and then say something to the effect, “I don’t know. I don’t know. That’s what we’re here to discuss or to find out.”
So, yes. Yes! There need to be ideas. The protesters admit it. They’re looking for the people with ideas.
Civilization was built on ideas, and there needs to be ideas that can be turned into action.
September 18, 2011 at 12:08 pm, Harold said:
The media –part of the problem. Wall Street is responsible for the collapse of the economy butnot a single high up has been prosecuted. Fraudsters one and and supported by the news media or else they wouldn’t be able to get away with it. .
September 29, 2011 at 6:42 pm, Sugarroxy277 said:
WE need to start our own “world”. We will not be able to change this government. It is too big and polluted. We can start our own schools in our own communities. We can start our own ” neighborhood bank”. what can the Monster government do about that? Think about what I am saying. Get your community master minds in one room and plan…..start our own “world” . With this Monster government the truth will NEVER be told.
Let’s ignore them and start our own!!
September 18, 2011 at 12:32 pm, Gregg Jocoy said:
I understand and agree with your support of moving money to credit unions. As a member of the Green Party of the United States I support the Green Party’s long standing “Move your money to Main Street” campaign…nice of you to notice.
That said, this is NOT a cure-all. The Federal Reserve, without so much as a “how do you do?” to Congress, can “print” as much “money” as the big banks “need”…isn’t that pretty much what happened? All the TRILLIONS the Federal Reserve created out of thin air kinda makes the few dollars I have, and many Americans have, seem pretty paltry.
September 18, 2011 at 1:10 pm, Anonymous Coward said:
If the top 1% have more wealth than the bottom 80% and more income than the bottom 60%, what on Earth makes you think that the banks rely on retail deposits to stay solvent? A single depositor at the Bank of New York can move more cash in a day than a small city can all year, but credit unions challenge economic domination… Right, and planting a tree will stop climate change.
September 20, 2011 at 1:52 am, Mattismz said:
The protest was enough to cause Wall Street some investment pains and created enough of a stir to indicate what’s to come should Wall Street, the government, the Federal Reserve and especially the Elite decide to continue their tyranny against the people. We are the majority. And we’ve all had more than enough abuse. Keep applying the pressure people! Let’s hit em where it hurts them the most, their wallets!!!
There are a few people who still choose to remain ignorant of current events. To them I say… If you prefer to stick your head in the sand, ignore what’s going on around you and are content to continue playing the codependent victim within a corrupt system, that is your choice. Enjoy your slavery! Nobody is coming to your rescue. Only you can do that for yourself.
October 03, 2011 at 3:14 am, Guest said:
Record Video Responses to: Occupy Wallstreet: Is this America’s Arab Spring?
http://vyou.com/montage/2440