“As soon as I’m let out of jail, I’ll be right back here and they’ll have to arrest me again.” – Ray Lewis
Today 200-plus people were arrested before 1:00 p.m. in New York City for participating in peaceful, non-violent protests related to Occupy Wall Street, which has seen perhaps its most trying turn of events in the past week. Among those arrested was retired Philadelphia Police Captain Ray Lewis (pictured above), who said, “All the cops are just workers for the one percent, and they don’t even realize they’re being exploited.”
Ray Lewis, who retired in 2004, has a lot of interesting things to say, and I want you to hear as much of it as possible.
“They complained about the park being dirty,” he said over the OWS Livefeed last night. “Here they are worrying about dirty parks when people are starving to death, where people are freezing, where people are sleeping in subways and they’re concerned about a dirty park. That’s obnoxious, it’s arrogant, it’s ignorant, it’s disgusting.”
What does that say about NYPD’s credibility? This guy did not run the police department of Anytown, USA – he ran the police department in Philadelphia, a city that can only be compared to a few other American cities in terms of size and scope, namely New York.
And that is where the heart of the protest has returned, after switching coasts and residing in Oakland, California for a moment. Not to detract from other occupations, but the mother of them all has returned to pivotal status.
Mayor Bloomberg has taken full responsibility for the NYPD’s actions two days ago. Last night Keith Olberman called for Mayor Bloomberg to resign. What does that say about him, that on national television his resignation is being requested?
To give an idea why Olberman took it to this level, an Associated Press report issued less than an hour ago reports that protesters were “bloodied during the arrests” today. Forget the question of legitimacy, the tactics are wrong.
Peaceful, verbal negotiation is systematically being rejected as a viable tactic in favor of physical aggression.
In another excerpt from a late night (circa 2 a.m.) interview done over OWS Livestream, Ray Lewis said the following about police tactics:
You should, by law, only use force to protect someone’s life or to protect them from being bodily injured. If you’re not protecting somebody’s life or protecting them from bodily injury, there’s no need to use force. And the number one thing that they always have in their favor that they seldom use is negotiation–continue to talk, and talk and talk to people. You have nothing to lose by that. This bullrush–what happened last night is totally uncalled for when they did not use negotiation long enough.
He is referring to the eviction, during which protesters were maimed, their property destroyed, and for what? Cleanliness? That reasoning is an insult to 1st Amendment rights, Mayor Bloomberg.
Today marks two months of Occupy Wall Street, and the authorities have made their position clear. New York City is at fever pitch.
Inform yourself, talk to your friends and family, understand that popular movements in the United States are fundamentally American. “Every generation needs a new revolution.” – Thomas Jefferson.
We skipped a couple generations, but this one has found its revolution in Occupy Everywhere. Next time you hear someone dismiss the Occupy movement as a bunch of hippies, remember Ray Lewis.
If you are thinking about donating to an occupation, organizers of Occupy Wall Street encourage you to donate to other chapters – as it were – since in Manhattan they have already received ample resources.
And for your viewing pleasure, the man himself, Ray Lewis:
And here’s Ray Lewis getting arrested by New York’s finest:
November 17, 2011 at 7:02 pm, Tom said:
Stupid is as stupid does ! Was always a loser and disgrace to the uniform.
That idiot should take a course in basic economics, maybe he could learn something !
November 17, 2011 at 10:47 pm, Laura Chandler said:
Cowards on the internet always sound the same.
November 17, 2011 at 8:45 pm, Just A Girl said:
Tom is a loser and a disgrace and needs to take a course in basic economics.
November 17, 2011 at 10:28 pm, Zinc said:
So, what exactly is this course he needs to take? I know of about 9 million unemployed people in this country who can’t find jobs. I would like to recommend them to take this course so that their lives improve as well.
November 18, 2011 at 1:21 am, Yeah Right said:
I believe she was referring to the troll below.
November 18, 2011 at 4:37 am, Bobby Kristensen said:
Only 9 million? More like 30 million.
November 17, 2011 at 10:48 pm, Laura Chandler said:
Great article, Kevin. Keep fighting the good fight.
November 17, 2011 at 11:07 pm, Ronpaul said:
End the Federal Reserve, End the bail outs, Ron Paul Revolution mother fucker
November 17, 2011 at 11:22 pm, Anonymous said:
Revolution for white Christian males who want to put 1820 political policy back into effect for the 21st century. Yeah, there’s no way that could go wrong…
November 18, 2011 at 10:25 am, Anonymous said:
yeah standing up for the constitution that YOUR country was founded on is a bad idea. Realize that the federal reserve, their bankers (JP morgan, goldman etc) and the corrupt thing you call a democratic government are causing this mess, intentionally.
I dare you to think critically and look beyond the corporate controlled media.
November 18, 2011 at 1:05 pm, Anonymous said:
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not in denial that the government is corrupt and I’m completely on board with the federal reserve being completely dismantled (as well as closing our many unnecessary and often unethical military bases around the world) but I’m not going to rely on an old man who’s convinced that this is a ‘christian nation’ and women aren’t people in addition to wanting to suddenly pretend we’re an isolated country with no need for foreign policy or diplomacy. All due respect (even though not that much is due), screw that. These are not revolutionary ideas. Seriously, his platform is from the 1820s. Last I checked, we’re in the 2000s.
November 18, 2011 at 1:26 pm, Anonymous said:
I’ve gone through his platform, listened to his debates, and could not find a lick of information like what you describe. Women aren’t people?? That’s outright wrong, perhaps you’re confusing “man” with the sex and not the race. Either put up real proof to back up your outrageous claims, or stop spamming.
November 18, 2011 at 1:54 pm, Anonymous said:
Ron Paul has said repeatedly he wants to do away with Roe vs Wade (viewing abortion as a crime and nothing more) and has also made comments suggesting equal pay isn’t possible for both genders because companies ‘shouldn’t have to hire unattractive women if they don’t want to.’ He claims he wants to cut military spending and world policing, but also insists war can be declared WITHOUT the approval of Congress. He wants to get rid of the income tax and death tax and create a system with a flat tax (completely unfair to anyone making less than 250,000 annually, since they’re going to hurt way more from the loss of funding for infrastructure and civil services). We can’t suddenly pretend we only have a couple million citizens to take care of, or that women and gays don’t need their rights constitutionally protected. In case people haven’t noticed, state governments aren’t doing all that great either, state governments are corrupt, too (hello, Wisconsin). It’s stupid to suggest we can’t trust federal officials, but somehow state officials are guaranteed to have citizens’ best interests at heart. Give me a break; it’s all people and people will always favor those they know over those they don’t, whether they’re in business or small/big government or politics. Anyway, I’m done. I’m sick of reading about this loon.
November 18, 2011 at 2:35 pm, Guest123 said:
Being against abortion and thinking women aren’t people are two different, separate things. Who will protect the right of the woman inside the womb, or do you not think she is a real person? Ron Paul also supports states rights to decide the constructs of marriage on an individual level. All this complaining, yet I would love to hear a better solution than Ron Paul.
November 18, 2011 at 2:35 pm, Guest123 said:
Being against abortion and thinking women aren’t people are two different, separate things. Who will protect the right of the woman inside the womb, or do you not think she is a real person? Ron Paul also supports states rights to decide the constructs of marriage on an individual level. All this complaining, yet I would love to hear a better solution than Ron Paul.
November 18, 2011 at 4:07 pm, Anonymous said:
Denying women a choice in reproductive and family planning by restricting access is irresponsible and petty.
November 18, 2011 at 5:18 pm, Guest123 said:
First, I do support abortion in cases of rape or deathly and serious harm to the mother. Outside of that, women do have a choice. They made that choice when they made the choice to reproduce or the choices that lead up to conceiving, with the exception of rape as previously stated. There are numerous females that chose not to get an abortion but have accepted the responsibility of raising a child, or at the very least bringing it into the world, even in the most dire of financial or profession situations. Another issue with abortion is that it is inherently sexist. If a women wants an abortion, she does not need the consent of the father to proceed. But if the father wants the women to have an abortion, the only way that is happening is if the woman agrees. If you agree with the woman’s choice for an abortion, would you also agree for a man’s choice and agree that if a man wanted an abortion, the woman should be forced to have one with or without her consent? Because it doesn’t seem fair that a man does not have an equal say on it as the woman does, does it?
November 18, 2011 at 6:00 pm, Anonymous said:
A man doesn’t have the right to turn a woman’s body into a prison for nine months just because he wants to be daddy. If the man wants fatherhood that badly, he can adopt. For the record, I agree that it is a decision that needs to be discussed and made by both parties, because that’s how parenthood and family planning needs to work. Forcing women to bear children against their will is sexist, regardless of whether or not the sex was consensual.
November 18, 2011 at 6:45 pm, Guest123 said:
A woman also does not have the right to take away a child from a man, just because she does not want to be a mommy. What do you say to a man that wants a biological child, but the mother wants an abortion? “Too bad, go adopt.” Do you know how hard it is to adopt? Trust me, a lot harder than having unprotected sex. I agree that forcing a woman to have an abortion is wrong, as that was the point I was trying to make. It is just as wrong and sexist to have an abortion without consent of the father. What do you say to the male if he wants to have an abortion but the mother does not? Does his choice not matter?
November 18, 2011 at 7:35 pm, Anonymous said:
It’s not as if you’re limited to one partner. If you want a kid but she doesn’t that partnership is never going to work due to lack of common goals and he’s going to have to find a new mate: he cannot force her to undergo pregnancy (which shockingly few people realize just how risky being pregnant can be to the woman’s health). If he wants an abortion but the mother does not, by making that decision she’s committed to raising that child alone or with a non-biological father figure (and yes, I have sympathy for men who have children they don’t want and so they must pay child support but that’s the price of unprotected sex). I wouldn’t say it’s sexist, but I agree it is wrong to have an abortion without explaining the reasons for that decision to the father (if women want men to pull equal weight in parenting duties, they have to agree to discussing these issues and recognizing the fact that it is his responsibility, too, as so he has to be involved in these decisions). I’m not advocating that people should get abortions as though it’s no big deal, but it isn’t right to restrict access, particularly among impoverished populations. Crack addicts don’t need more babies to neglect and raise into petty criminal life styles.
November 21, 2011 at 1:23 pm, Anonymous said:
Go find a willing Mother. and when Men can give birth, they can decide if they want to or not.
November 23, 2011 at 12:51 pm, Tanya said:
the problem with the rape comment above is the fact that women in this day and age are still being blamed for their own rape because of the way they act and dress….and then have to go to court to prove they were raped…. this could take a very long time (long enough time to have a baby) to get through the court system in order to be fair to everyone (including the rapist). What is the solution there? Further more because it is the womans body, I would say she has MORE say in the decision than the man does… until men start having their own babies, it should remain this way.
November 20, 2011 at 12:00 pm, Anonymous said:
Ron Paul supports denying the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT a choice in reproductive and family planning. He is personally against abortion (as a OBGYN, he might have some perspective that you lack such as watching an abortion being performed) but is not for a federal ban. It is a states rights issue, not a healthcare issue. The federal government has no jurisdiction in healthcare.
November 20, 2011 at 1:24 pm, Anonymous said:
oh yeah, completely not in any way a health issue at all (except for that tiny part of it having everything to do with women’s health and family health)… The federal government SHOULD have NO jurisdiction in healthcare, yet they think they know better than us which drugs are evil and which are medicine: it’s far more important we do away with scheduling and the drug war than try to convert abortion into a state’s rights issue just to make it seem ‘neater.’ This debate is never going to be neat and simple (and it shouldn’t be: it’s too important for seemingly ‘easy’ solutions). Refusing to protect women and their bodies constitutionally would be a grave failure for future of this nation (among dozens of other reasons, do we really need more casey anthonys in the world?) Right now, even with Roe vs Wade, millions of women desperate for abortion cannot obtain one because of lack of transportation, funding, knowledge of where one may be safely obtained, and, particularly in small communities and rural areas, a fierce social stigma against them (whatever their choice ends up being). That would not get better, it would get worse.
It’s not as if I haven’t read his statements. I appreciate that he understands it would be just has unconstitutional to ban it across the board, but it isn’t fair to deny millions of women access because they live in a state that refuses to provide services.
November 21, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Anonymous said:
Oh they worry about the fetus but once you are born get a job or 3. Let us poison you through deregulation, so you can buy our shoved through drugs, that will poison you even more maybe he should worry about the people of this country and quit playing BS games.
November 18, 2011 at 11:38 am, Rezajjca said:
lady as a born again christian, who lived in Iran as Muslim and saw injustice of any religion… I can tell you that any freedom that you have in your country is because o the effect Christianity in your country..if your law and regulation did not have some resemblance to the bible… those police could literally rape anyone that was there
November 18, 2011 at 1:14 pm, Anonymous said:
Yeah, christianity has such a great impact on this country: teaching people to hate and fear their own bodies, convincing them this life isn’t worth anything more than a test so we don’t really have to try to improve things because jesus will take care of it, or convincing people that women are second-rate citizens at best. You don’t think christians rape? well, that’s beyond ignorant (just look at Penn state, I don’t think that guy was muslim. Or does rape not count when committed against people of color, just like it isn’t rape when it happens in marriage…?) If our laws had resemblance to the bible, the majority of our citizens would have to be executed, probably including you. (are you sure you’re not wearing mixed fabrics and you’ve never eaten shellfish and you were a virgin on your wedding night and you’ve never felt emotions like envy or anger or desire?)
November 18, 2011 at 2:22 pm, Guest123 said:
You have literally taken the worst, most exaggerated aspects of religion and applied it to paint a picture of fundamental Christianity. Christianity teaches people to love everyone no matter how they look, to always try to improve the life of someone else as an act of kindness, and that the mother of Jesus is one of the most important figures of Christianity. Not only did the previous poster never imply Christians do not rape, or anything near that, but then assuming that because the guy from Penn state is white then he must be a Christian, is incredibly ignorant and makes you look like a hypocrite. What rape against people of diverse ethnic backgrounds or in marriage has to do with the Penn State scandal is beyond me. Our laws have always resembled the bible, such as laws against stealing and killing. You can continue regurgitating all these statements you read in a biased book or heard from your humanities/social sciences teacher all you want, but it makes you look like you are trying to force your radical ideas upon us, and then chastising Christians for doing the same thing.
November 18, 2011 at 4:13 pm, Anonymous said:
One: I didn’t give you ANY of my ideas so you have no way to know whether they’re radical or not. Two: ALL human cultures have laws against stealing and killing: correlation is not causation. Three: Christianity’s focus on obedience has giving us a nation of people incapable of thinking for themselves. Four: Don’t even talk to me as if I’m trying to convert you: I’ve had christian messages shoved down my throat for as long as I’ve been alive and I have right to be disgusted by that. Morality comes from compassion, not fear of punishment.
November 18, 2011 at 5:06 pm, Guest123 said:
One: You have been constantly spouting the idea that Christianity is inherently bad. This is radical as the majority of people disagree in the US. Two: not every single human culture has laws. And I mean laws in general. There are plenty of indigenous tribes that do not have laws and rely on a code of conduct. Not to mention that early human settlements were killing and stealing from each other. Three: You imply that because someone is a Christian that are somehow in a collection of sheep and do whatever someone else tells them to do. You provide an air of superiority as you believe you are somehow “gifted” with the undeniable knowledge that religion is bad speak negatively about anyone who follows Christianity, as well as Christianity as a whole when the entire goal of Christianity is to make one a better person. You blaming Christianity is like blaming Science for the atomic bomb or Modern Medicine for high rates of suicide among teenagers. If I do not think for myself, then where could I possibly be coming up with these arguments against your statements. You may deny how I described your behavior if you wish, I am just stating that this is how you come across to people like me. Four: But you are trying to convert me. What else could be the possible goal of telling me Christianity is horrible? Because it isn’t anything I have not heard before. I may not be trying to convert you to Christianity, but I am trying to convert you to be more compassionate towards followers of religion. You cherry pick the negative aspects when portraying it, so you shouldn’t have to be upset that someone would speak against it. If you want to talk about shoving ideologies down one’s throat, you brought this argument by bringing up religion by attacking Ron Paul. You are right, you do have the right to be disgusted. But I have the right to state my case as well. I have not, in any way, tried to take away your right to say anything. I just disagree with it and can no longer not say anything while someone attacks a righteous ideology such as religion and blames it instead of the individuals that should be held accountable.
November 18, 2011 at 11:30 pm, Anonymous said:
You’re right, I’m being unfair stating all christians can’t think for themselves. I just find it odd most decent christians I’ve met deny some or all of the bible (though they still hold it as the ultimate book of ‘truth,’ despite refusing to believe key parts of it). No, I’m not trying to convert you (if I was I would be very careful not to antagonize you, which I am clearly not concerned with in this post). (If you’re truly wondering, my goal would be reassuring other athiests they are not alone in their frustration, and possibly giving some christians some points to ponder, assuming they’re willing to). I agree: individuals should be held accountable. But somehow, if that person is christian they couldn’t have done anything bad (and if they did do something bad, they couldn’t be ‘christian’). Having religion does not mean you are a moral person: it means you have a specific set of principles (some of them often random and absurd) that you adhere to. (I hate this example, but…) Hitler was a religious person. Yes, I brought up this argument while attacking Ron Paul, because he attaches his christianity to nearly every opinion and policy decision he makes, which understandably concerns me if he’s to be considered a viable candidate for the presidency.
On an unrelated note, I would like to express my gratitude to you for being respectful and thorough in this discussion with me–those are qualities that have been quite rare in my conversations with christians online, so thank you.
November 20, 2011 at 11:56 am, Anonymous said:
Ron Paul does not attach Christianity to his opinions and policy decisions. That is just wrong and shows you are participating in the main stream media echo chamber without regard for the truth. Ron Paul attaches liberty to his opinions and policy decisions. If you can stand some long form reading in order to educate yourself, please look into Liberty Defined by Ron Paul or just look beyond the echo chamber. Your being fooled. Please research Ron Paul’s platform, it will make sense then.
November 20, 2011 at 1:31 pm, Anonymous said:
If he is truly devout there is NO way he could not attach it to everything: it’s a major part of his worldview. I think it’s ignorant of him to assume federal government is easily corrupted, but state government is not. Call it a personal bias (because that’s definitely what it is) but I’ll never be able to fully trust anyone labeling themselves as christian. I’ve been tricked, lied to, insulted, and discriminated against extremely consistently by supposed well-meaning religious types my whole life and I’m sick of it and even if it means I don’t get to vote because there aren’t any suitable candidates then fine, it’s never felt like my country anyway. Representative democracy will never be without corruption and I’m tired of trying to convince myself that one day it might be.
November 23, 2011 at 1:14 pm, Anonymous said:
Though for the record, he’s a lot better bet than Bush was or Romney is, so I’ll give you guys that.
December 15, 2011 at 4:51 pm, Anonymous said:
Since this whole debate, I’ve been researching Ron Paul’s platform and contributors. If I was going to vote, it would probably be for him, especially considering he’d be limited to two terms max anyway. As is, I’ve completely lost faith in representative democracy and no longer believe it can protect and stand for justice.
November 18, 2011 at 6:30 pm, Foxnewsnorth said:
It was not Christianity that did that, it was religion. Religion hijacked Christianity a long time ago. Pity…
November 17, 2011 at 11:12 pm, Professional1222 said:
Tom, you prove your point with your own stupid words. Thanks for exposing yourself as another idiot to dumb to think for yourself. Turn off Fox opinion (not news by any stretch of the imagination), grow some balls and learn to think for yourself. By the way, you have some Hannity dripping down your chin ….
November 18, 2011 at 4:12 am, Dave Yuhnke said:
For general info, FOX wanted to operate in Canada but backed off because under Canadian law any station which calls itself a “News” station must broadcast content that is ‘substantially accurate’. Lying to the public doesn’t cut it in Canada.
November 18, 2011 at 6:26 pm, Foxnewsnorth said:
This is not the case anymore. Our Prime minister had it changed on Feb 9, 2011. Our ‘news’ can now ‘knowingly mislead’ the public…we now have Fox North or as it is called here Sun news.
November 17, 2011 at 11:54 pm, Joan Pawsat said:
what do u want the use of the word conundrum to reavel interviewer?
November 18, 2011 at 12:04 am, Joan Pawsat said:
endangered. that’s y people think they can call 911 if their order wrong at mcdonalds or if they think they see someone driving naked or something.
November 18, 2011 at 1:00 am, Kalen said:
This made me think completely differently about the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
November 18, 2011 at 1:00 am, Kalen said:
This made me think completely differently about the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
November 18, 2011 at 8:19 am, Shadowtrake55 said:
I
agree with one main point in this article about continuing to use a resource
not only available to the NYPD, but to the protesters. “TALK, TALK,
TALK….” what happened to this ideal, is where I also have a problem with
the occupiers. Interrupting the lives of those who are still able to work in
Manhattan, isn’t only affecting the 1% they are are attempt to interrupt.
Stopping traffic and the attempts to close streets and subway stations makes me
a bit uneasy….
November 18, 2011 at 4:15 pm, Quizmasterchris said:
Philadelphian chiming in here – great article but FYI the rank of Capatin does not run the city’s police force, we have a Commissioner. Captain is quite a high rank at the District (other cities might say “Precinct”) level.
November 18, 2011 at 5:50 pm, etherial_cru... said:
Ray Lewis stood tall in his police captain’s suit. He stood tall and was counted worthy of being dishonored for the name of the 99%. My hat goes off to him and all others that stand and be counted, especially in uniform. That takes intestinal fortitude.
November 18, 2011 at 6:13 pm, Concerned Citizen said:
The Occupy “movement” is a bunch of hippies and people seeking 5 minutes of fame (RETIRED Ray Lewis). Most of them don’t have any idea what they’re “peacefully” protesting. This is America… you don’t stand in the way of other people who are trying to make a few bucks. Occupy is the 1% and should relocate to Canada if they don’t like our country. Lewis wiped the dust off of his old uniform and hit the streets in hope of getting some face-time.
Police do three things when handling a situation–Ask, Tell, Make (Force). Negotiation can only go so far when dealing with these ignorant people. They are changing nothing…except their future chances of being hired after obtaining criminal records. Today’s “peaceful” Occupy protesters are tomorrow’s criminals.
November 18, 2011 at 6:36 pm, Foxnewsnorth said:
Occupy knows exactly what they are protesting however, the 1% own the news and will not report it. They purposely seek out homeless, down and out ‘protesters’ and put them on the news to fool people like you into thinking that is what the ‘movement’ is all about. In case you haven’t noticed, conservative governments around the world gave all our tax money to the billionaires and what good did it do? none! they want our children s and grandchildren’s tax money too! Wake up for heavens sake…and oh yeah, learn how to garden…iy will come in handy real soon!
November 18, 2011 at 6:39 pm, Foxnewsnorth said:
Occupy knows exactly what they are protesting however, the 1% own the news and will not report it. They purposely seek out homeless, down and out ‘protesters’ and put them on the news to fool people like you into thinking that is what the ‘movement’ is all about. In case you haven’t noticed, conservative governments around the world gave all our tax money to the billionaires and what good did it do? none! they want our children s and grandchildren’s tax money too! Wake up for heavens sake…and oh yeah, learn how to garden…it will come in handy real soon!
November 18, 2011 at 8:04 pm, PunctuallyChallenged said:
What a bunch of communist whiners. Benjamin Franklin may have said it best: “industry needs not wish.” Get off your asses and make your own way instead of whining about the opportunities and abilities of those who have. Food for thought: how many of the one percent do you suppose immigrated, or had parents who immigrated, to the US with no assets to speak of?
November 18, 2011 at 10:22 pm, Maureen said:
I heard you. Thank you for your plea. It’s honest, and I feel your frustration in not being able to participate because of your children. That is valid and pragmatic. Don’t despair – those that can, will. You did your part, and I’m sure, will continue to, as your circumstance allows. Meanwhile, know that noble souls spread the word and fight the patriot’s cause. I’m giving you a link to an important lecture by a great teacher who understands what this is all about: Marianne Williamson Speaking on the Occupy Movement – YouTube Chris – pass it on!
November 18, 2011 at 10:27 pm, Maureen said:
YouTube: Marianne Williamson Speaking on the Occupy Movement
November 18, 2011 at 11:31 pm, VT said:
Captain Ray Lewis is the only MAN left standing amongst the thuggish brutish gatekeepers & palace guards we know as the police the world over. we all tip our hats to thee.
November 18, 2011 at 11:54 pm, Lesa Frantz said:
I hope he has remained safe. Has anyone heard from him since his arrest? I am anxious to know what happened while they had him in custody. I was very worried.
I caught him on live stream and think he is a very wise man. If only the PD here would listen to him over Brookberg… he’d help them get their priorities straight.
Though, I think the PD are thinking this urban paramilitary game in the streets for real shit is cool… I know, I saw all the smiles of glee some of you had in videos. I didn’t see a damn one of you tear up. Did the guys with hearts stay home that night, so you filled their spot with your very own life size NYPD prick action figures?
listen PD morons if you ever find this page – if you ever learned how to read- real people get hurt when you pick them up and hoist them over a fence onto concrete… the bodies your slamming into and beating with your fists and sticks are real. this ain’t no video game.
I can’t wait for the day you all have to say thank you to the 99% for saving this country for -even sorry asses like you. But we’ll look you in the eye and remind you that we did it for your kids. A leave a gift for those kids – a video that shows daddy beating up the peaceful protesters that made our country better.
February 09, 2012 at 10:29 am, Vender Ouro said:
Good day! I just wish to give a huge thumbs up for the good info you’ve got here on this post. I will probably be coming back to your weblog for more soon.
February 10, 2012 at 12:09 pm, Carol Assuncao said:
Eu deve verificar com você aqui. Que não é uma coisa que eu geralmente faço! Recebo o prazer da leitura de uma posta que fará com que as pessoas pensam. Além disso, graças por permitir-me a comentar!
February 11, 2012 at 7:19 am, Corey Staires said:
Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group? There’s a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Cheers
February 11, 2012 at 2:02 pm, Lajuana Winstead said:
Definitely, what a splendid site and instructive posts, I definitely will bookmark your website.Have an awsome day!
February 11, 2012 at 5:08 pm, a4324845 said:
I’ve said that least 4324845 times. SCK was here
February 12, 2012 at 3:42 am, halitosis cures said:
Sweet blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Cheers
February 12, 2012 at 3:51 am, insurance premium tax said:
Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your weblog. You have some really good articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Many thanks!
February 12, 2012 at 8:15 am, solicitors in wallington said:
I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A couple of my blog readers have complained about my site not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any recommendations to help fix this issue?
February 12, 2012 at 10:28 am, Narcisa Mientka said:
I have to express some thanks to you just for rescuing me from this challenge. Because of looking out through the internet and meeting ways which were not productive, I assumed my life was well over. Living minus the approaches to the difficulties you’ve sorted out by way of this blog post is a serious case, and ones which could have in a wrong way affected my career if I had not come across your web page. Your actual understanding and kindness in maneuvering all areas was valuable. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t come upon such a subject like this. It’s possible to at this moment look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for your impressive and result oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to endorse your web page to any individual who would like care on this problem.
February 12, 2012 at 3:44 pm, Napoleon said:
Thanks a ton for sharing your ideas. As a author, I’m constantly hunting for fresh and different approaches to look at a matter. I actually find excellent inspiration in doing so. Many thanks again
February 12, 2012 at 4:00 pm, balanza A&D said:
I adore the appear of your site. I recently built mine and I was searching for some ideas for my site and you gave me a few. May possibly I ask you whether you developed the website by youself?
February 12, 2012 at 4:29 pm, gadget news said:
This really is a very good subject to speak about. Sometimes I fav stuff like this on Redit. I don’t feel this would be the very best to submit though. I’ll take a appear about your website though and submit something else.
February 20, 2012 at 10:26 pm, Charles Wyman said:
integrity
March 24, 2012 at 1:26 am, Dolly Scrogham said:
You are a very capable person!
April 03, 2012 at 9:56 pm, Surtees Barcrusher said:
Hi, I log on to your blog daily. Your humoristic style is awesome, keep it up!
May 04, 2012 at 8:42 am, Enio Trupi said:
We are nothing but mindless puppets.
May 09, 2012 at 5:47 pm, Alisa Tomlinson said:
You should, by law, only use force to protect someone’s life or to protect them from being bodily injured. If you’re not protecting somebody’s life or protecting them from bodily injury, there’s no need to use force. And the number one thing that they always have in their favor that they seldom use is negotiation–continue to talk, and talk and talk to people. You have nothing to lose by that. This bullrush–what happened last night is totally uncalled for when they did not use negotiation long enough.