You have to hand it to Ron Paul—as a non-establishment guy, he’s made much bigger waves in the presidential election than most outsiders typically do. No one ever took Ralph Nader as much more than a novelly idealistic sideshow to the main event, and as much as Ross Perot was able to flirt with legitimacy in the early ’90s, there was just no way someone was going to get elected from outside the two main parties.
As political outsiders go, the Ron Paul 2012 campaign has been a smashing success. And yet he hasn’t won a single state primary. He came in second in New Hampshire and again last week in Minnesota, but second seems to be about as close as he can get. Minnesota, remember, was a state that elected Jesse Ventura as governor—a guy who thinks FEMA is building concentration camps to store American citizens. If an eccentric like Ron Paul win somewhere, it would probably be Minnesota.
Nonetheless, there is one Republican vote that Paul has dominated as the top dog for the past two years: the CPAC straw poll.
Last year Paul’s supporters stormed the auditorium where his victory was being announced, cheering him for minutes on end. Sure, there is some suspicion out there that Paul’s vote was won by supporters who bought up 1,000 tickets to the event and filled it with the Paul-friendly voters to cast ballots. But is this really all that different from the way regular campaigns raise money to monopolize our attention with ads and make the election feel less like a conversation and more like an inevitability? And couldn’t other candidates’ supporters just as easily have bought tickets?
The point is that he won convincingly, and earned a lot of media attention for it.
While CPAC clearly isn’t a state primary and doesn’t count toward the election, it is a highly influential gathering and an annual touchstone for the conservative agenda—kind of like SxSW is for indie rock. Winning CPAC this year would send an important message in a year when sending messages has been so important for the Paul campaign.
Just last week, as Ron Paul was celebrating his second place finish in Minnesota, Rick Santorum was trumpeting his own victory in that state. Last June, Santorum said, “[I will] fight very strongly against libertarian influence within the Republican party and the conservative movement.”
CPAC is the kind of event that moves the needle on dialogue, where cultural milieus get established. Skipping the event and handing Santorum a victory could help shift momentum back from the brand of Libertarianism Paul has been fighting for and whipping his supporters into a frenzy over.
Paul’s campaign says he needs to miss the event due to a hectic travel schedule, but the Washington Post notes he doesn’t have any official travel plans on his agenda. His son, the also-controversial Sen. Rand Paul, will be in attendance to speak on the presidential candidate’s behalf.
Why Paul would give up the chance at perhaps his only first place victory of the primary season is beyond me. If you have ideas, let us know in the comments section.





February 09, 2012 at 10:01 pm, Jake Wright said:
I would have to assume it is to give his son Rand, who I am convinced will ultimately take up his cause and carry it forward, the chance to gain more exposure. Also, as noted, the media has become quite good at discounting the results of straw polls that Dr Paul wins, saying they were "over-run" by Paul supporters. So even if Dr Paul showed up and won, it would be discounted (as has been the case with all other straw polls he wins), and is therefore a waste of time that could be better used by giving "face time" to Rand instead.
February 09, 2012 at 10:13 pm, Jarrod Dowell said:
Ahhh the right to privacy, isn't it grand. Now all we can do is sit and gossip about it. The man made a choice not to go. Enough said.
February 09, 2012 at 10:43 pm, Revol Ution said:
delegates.
he's working for delegates.
February 09, 2012 at 10:54 pm, David Charleston said:
Yep, if his Paul's candidacy has any success, it will continue on w/ Rand either as a 3rd party for this election or the next. It's a smart a decision.
February 09, 2012 at 10:55 pm, David Charleston said:
Yep, if Paul's candidacy has any success, it will continue on w/ Rand either as a 3rd party for this election or the next. It's a smart a decision.
February 09, 2012 at 10:55 pm, David Charleston said:
Yep, if Paul's candidacy has any success, it will continue on w/ Rand either as a 3rd party for this election or the next. It's a smart decision.
February 09, 2012 at 11:53 pm, Terrance Brennan said:
The reasons he won't be attending? Well for beginners, Ron Paul wasn't invited! That's correct; having won the last two events-he wasn't invited.The reason given? His supports booed during one of the candidate's speeches (not that Paul wasn't booed during the televised debates by someone else's supporters. In any case Rand is the stand in.
February 10, 2012 at 12:23 am, Aziz Meshiea said:
"Why Paul would give up the chance at perhaps his only first place victory of the primary season is beyond me. "
really? Speaking at CPAC is not a victory, he has done it often enough and won the straw polls often enough to have claimed the position of victory without doing it now when he actually can win states.
His son (not well tested in my view) can shout out his ideals and meanwhile his pres bid can have legs. Why would someone who has a real chance of winning the nomination, no matter what the pundits and manipulated tallies say, go into that CPAC circus?
RP is shutting down the Republican establishment, he is breaking down the whole idea of left right, dem-rep, and speaking about the America we have strayed so far from. Do you really think he is going to play those reindeer games anymore?
February 09, 2012 at 10:44 pm, Paul, Obama collect most military donations to run – Washington Times | Amazing News said:
[...] politics pack less punch than his honestyDaily CalifornianRon Paul Blew Off CPACDaily BeastDeath and Taxes -ArmyTimes.com -CNN (blog)all 40 news articles » This entry was posted [...]
February 10, 2012 at 9:13 am, Rand Paul takes the family mantle at CPAC | Death and Taxes said:
[...] Rand Paul takes the family mantle at CPAC By Andrew Belonsky 1 min agoPresidential candidate Ron Paul is skipping the annual CPAC event this year, allegedly because of scheduling conflicts. Don’t [...]
February 10, 2012 at 2:50 pm, Bobby Myers said:
I am starting to see that there is corruption all the way down to the county level when it comes to politics! I personally know of 12 people who were not given a chance to be a delegate because the party decided to NOT go by their own rules and instead they decided to go with old rules! Why do they cheat Paul at every corner? Why didn't he go to CPAC? Because it would only hurt him when all the reporters would just discount his win and say it was a fluke and it didn't matter! The more I get involved…the more I see how they only want to limit our choices! Something stinks all the way to the core!
March 09, 2012 at 9:00 pm, Steven Revill said:
Bobby you are exactly right, and we must bind together and stop it ! Same goes for all the senator and congress openings. We need to get rid of all of them and put people in their place like you and I and work to really change the whole game. Otherwise getting Ron into the oval office won't do a bit of good. Then we can truly change the situation and get back to where we should be. Won't be easy, but anything worth doing never is easy. It can be done though and I personally think this is the last chance we will have to do it.
February 12, 2012 at 7:24 am, horny said:
Great post! It always amaze me how people can take time to write them. But to be honest maybe you should change the color of the texts? Sorry if I am being rude, just trying to help. Kind regards, Sophia