
President Obama is flipping the script on conservatives by turning their political lexicon against them. First, the commander-in-chief yesterday described right wing efforts to overturn health care reform as “judicial activism,” a term his ideological opposites most often use to describe liberal judges who rule in favor of gay rights.
“I just remind conservative commentators that for years, what we’ve heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law,” Obama said yesterday.
And later today he’s making a speech about GOP Congressman Paul Ryan’s budget plan, which the president will reportedly describe as a “radical vision” and “thinly veiled social Darwinism,” two charges Republicans have made about Obama’s own policies. And, actually, Ryan’s plans, too: Newt Gingrich came under heavy conservative fire last year when he called Ryan’s previous budget an example of “right-wing social engineering,” a not-so-distant linguistic cousin to Obama’s “social Darwinism” label.
The president clearly wants to take some of the wind out of right-wing sails by co-opting their language, and it just might work: after years of being conditioned to perk up, and act out, at certain phrases, conservatives may soon see that the message they’ve been following for so long has led them astray, and that the president actually knows what he’s talking about.





April 03, 2012 at 1:21 pm, Ed Julian said:
It shouldn't be news. President Obama may not always agree with me, but he's definitely right more often than most. I think he cares about his impact on our world enough to do his homework. He also has Just a Tad bit more access to the bigger picture. This is one issue of many, that really needs all he can muster. Let him know we have his back!
April 03, 2012 at 1:52 pm, David B Sky said:
just sad to me this Obummer thing I'd rather have an asshole republican frankly instead of this BS about Obummer being a liberal then at least we know where we stand – now, if we had the asshole republican, when this crash comes, there would be more people in the streets than if we have Obummer when the crash comes because we have been conditioned to believe that he is on "our side" while those stupid republicans are soo obviously "against us" – the whole system is a sham, their all against us, one war that looks like many, a war against us all?
April 03, 2012 at 3:17 pm, Jeremy Arthur Vandelay said:
Obama is a douche. His presidency is like this crazy hyped #1 draft pick that turns out to be a complete flop. He has gone back on virtually every worthwhile promise he made, from allowing pharmaceuticals to be imported to lower the cost to protecting us from recording our phone calls without warrants.
He has made it very clear with his words whose side he wants us to THINK he is on, and actions have made it even more clear which side he is actually on.
April 03, 2012 at 3:29 pm, Rory Corrigan said:
So which is worse: the one that says he will not screw us, but does, or the one that TELLS us that they will screw us?
April 03, 2012 at 3:41 pm, Jeremy Arthur Vandelay said:
Well, at least with the guy that isn't even masking it, the people will remain active. All the war protests disappeared once Obama got in, and the Occupy movement was almost a parody because half of them didn't even realize Obama had voted for the bailouts
Soooo… I'm not really sure.
April 07, 2012 at 9:30 pm, Clennis Jones said:
I've never witnessed the GOP being like this. Bald faced lies on national TV, this is not your father's GOP. Now, Eric "the weasel" Cantor is trying to oust some members of his own party. I've yet to see Prez Obama feed us lies. I've known in the past that both partys always agree'd to disagree, and at the same time be respectful of one another. Not anymore. It's gotten to be pathetic among the GOP. Stay tuned Jeremy, the GOP is in charge of Entertainment.