
The first lawsuit related to the James Holmes shooting has been filed by a movie-goer who was in attendance at the Century Aurora 16 last Thursday night—but not one who was in theater 9.
TMZ reports that Torrence Brown, Jr., was in theater 16 at the time of the shooting. Brown’s friend A.J. Boik was in theater 9, and was shot in the chest and killed. Brown has hired attorney Donald Karpel to sue for damages for the extreme trauma he suffered and continues to suffer.
Karpel tells TMZ that his suit targets three parties: The theater, which he claims was negligent in leaving the emergency exit doors at the rear of the teater unguarded (TMZ says it’s “widely believed Holmes entered the theater with a ticket, propped the emergency door open from inside, went to his car and returned with guns), Holmes’ doctors, who Karpel says prescribed drugs Holmes was on during the shooting and for which they failed to monitor him, and Warner Brothers.
Of implicating Warner Brothers in the suit, Karpel implies that the movie’s violence confused viewers who thought Holmes’ shooting was part of the scene. He says, “Somebody has to be responsible for the rampant violence that is shown today.”
Not that anyone has the right to judge the experience of anyone who was at Century 16 last Thursday night, but it does seem odd that the first lawsuit filed in the incident is from someone who wasn’t in theater 9. Clearly there were many hundreds of people traumatized by the event, both in theater 9 and outside of it—maybe some kind of class action suit would better express solidarity between the victims?
At any rate, including Warner Bros. in the suit is bound to be the biggest conversation starter. If an incident like Aurora can’t move the political needle in terms of curbing machine gun sales I can’t imagine we’d entertain legal ramifications for putting a gun in a movie. Then again, entertainment industry lobbying is no match for the NRA’s influence.





July 24, 2012 at 4:02 pm, John Schwab said:
Another fool that thinks he has hit the lottery, and he didn't even buy a ticket.
July 29, 2012 at 4:47 am, Joe Bender March said:
legitimate reason. the walls are cheap. bullets shouldnt go threw that far. He wasnt in the same movie theater. #1 rule of emergency exit, alarm will sound. what the fuck? Lemmie repeat it for slowies ALARM WILL SOUND. No gun policy. Violence is always a blame so thats a given their gonna say. and ALARM WILL SOUND i cannot stress enough how this event could have saved so many deaths cuzz one dumb idiot didnt put in that have it active or turned it off.. plus no news why there was no sound. so that tells you where peoples minds are in this case. "cover up"
July 24, 2012 at 4:35 pm, Angela T Jones said:
I agree with you John. Thhis man is an opportunist. Not only was he traumatized by the violent attack in Aurora, the whole NATION was. Does this mean we ALL get to file a lawsuit again the movie theater, against Holmes' doctor (which BTW I think dude was also self medicating himself and even possibly using himself as a guinea pig in his neuroscience research – but JMO) and against Warner Bros. Of course not. Because it's not reasonable. We didn't get to sue over 911, Columbine, Waco or anything else because our trauma was secondary if not at all for some. People are quick to sue. I say we sue this guy for NOT having a permit to carrya handgun to protect the other movie goers that night. Bet he wouldn't appreciate that at all.
July 24, 2012 at 4:37 pm, Angela T Jones said:
I agree with you John. This man is an opportunist. Not only was he traumatized by the violent attack in Aurora, the whole NATION was. Does this mean we ALL get to file a lawsuit again the movie theater, against Holmes' doctor (which BTW I think dude was also self medicating himself and even possibly using himself as a guinea pig in his neuroscience research – but JMO) and against Warner Bros. Of course not. Because it's not reasonable. We didn't get to sue over 911, Columbine, Waco or anything else because our trauma was secondary if not at all for some. People are quick to sue. I say we sue this guy for NOT having a permit to carry a handgun to protect the other movie goers that night. Bet he wouldn't appreciate that at all.
July 24, 2012 at 6:42 pm, Gregor Wakefield said:
He should be suing due to the theater's "Gun Free Zone" policy in state that allows concealed carry. They took away the right to defend yourself.
July 24, 2012 at 8:37 pm, Al Day said:
I fully agree. This dude should be allowed to sue to allow protection to be carried at all times. And futhermore those who think we should give up our guns and allow the 'authorities' to protect us may find they are out of time while waiting for a response. No money, though. Just a change in the policies of this decaying nation. Our nation allows infiltration cross our borders regularly and the violence will only grow as time goes on. Bad economy coupled with cucky people means self preservation is something everyone needs to consider. Good luck with the law suit. Deterrents do curb bad behavior. It's the same reason the Russians never nuked us.
July 27, 2012 at 11:05 am, Colorado shooting victim sues creators of Batman movie, movie theater, and doctor of gunman - Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 5 - City-Data Forum said:
[...] He wasn't even in the theater where the shooting occurred, or even in an adjacent theater. First lawsuit filed over James Holmes shooting | Death and Taxes Similar [...]