
Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not a Christian, I’m not a Republican, not your boring white dad, and I definitely didn’t believe everything “Reefer Madness” told me about getting high. But if nationwide marijuana legalization were up for vote any time soon, I would have to check the box marked “no.”
Why? Well, in a nutshell: because fuck no to rules, man.
There are many issues in this debate routinely overlooked my fellow smokers, which if brought to light might change your opinion about Uncle Sam giving us the big OK-GO.
Legalization (of anything, not just marijuana), while packaged as this freeing and wonderful golden egg to be snatched up after beating the boss at the end of level IV, is really a big set of rules designed to direct funds from one account to another in the interest of legislators, politicians, and the corporations that fund them. Big Marijuana, as an extension of Big Tobacco, will absolutely employ the same tactics that is has for years with cigarettes including (but not limited to) the heinous use of addiction-enhancing additives and artificial flavorings, co-opting of smoking culture, manipulation of the legal system and FDA guidelines for further financial gain, and the manipulation of “controlled” lab testing to fight the annoying and inevitable hell that will rain down on them from the Christian Right if this bill ever goes through.
I must point out that smoking mary-jane is in no way a victimless crime. I’m not going to get into how many people die working for the cartel every year while they transport the good stuff through tunnels under the border, but there are carcinogens produced during the combustion of weed, just as there are during the combustion of tobacco. That said, there is no reason to add insult to injury as Big Marijuana inevitably will, if it means they will turn a higher profit. (See what I did there?)
In 1994, a list of 599 additives, created by five major American cigarette companies, was approved by the Department of Health and Human Services for use in mainstream tobacco production. Under the guise of organoleptic use, or to appeal to the senses, these additives range from harmless (acetic acid, almond bitter oil), to downright villainous (skatole, thymol, dimethyl sulfide) and all increase the addictive properties of an already addicting plant.
Marijuana, also arguably addictive because of its naturally occurring Tetrahydrocannabinol, does not need any additional dependency causing qualities, in my humble opinion, and as a purist I prefer to obtain the cleanest marijuana possible anyway. While this isn’t always possible on the black market (some growers use toxic pesticides, or have the nerve to lace their product), it is much less of a risk than it would be if Phillip Morris started dipping his filthy hands into the pot.
Furthermore, mainstream tobacco production, which we can safely assume will be mimicked for marijuana, includes many wetting and drying processes which degrade the quality and flavor of the plant. These losses are then compensated for or covered up using chemicals and artificial flavors. Meanwhile, this is easily avoided by dealing with home-growers in small batches who take pride in their curing.
Now, you may be thinking, “So? Who says I have to buy a pack of Marlboro Marleys? Can’t I just keep getting it from the dude who lives on the 2nd floor of my apartment building?”
Maybe. After all, the black market will never be completely stamped out. But the truth of the matter is that legalization of marijuana will translate into harsher penalties for independent marijuana growers and distributors because they will be viewed as “taking money out of Big Marijuana’s pocket.” Lobbyists for Big Tobacco will push for stricter legislation to protect their industry and crackdowns on even small-time dealers will ensue. For every grower or dealer that is caught and used as an example by the courts to his colleagues, you can count on 2-5 more quitting the business out of fear. Of course, this isn’t even taking into consideration how many of them will give up because their business will slow too much to be sustainable now that their clientele can buy legally and conveniently by simply walking down to the corner store.
Finally, marijuana “culture”—I’ll be the first to say, it fucking sucks. I don’t like tie-dye, I don’t think the 7-pointed leaf makes for a good logo, hemp should only be used to make paper, and please cut your fucking hair. But even still, it’s a culture that has been developing organically for decades. Can you even begin to imagine what will happen to it when the creative directors who used a cartoon camel wearing sunglasses to sell cigarettes to children get their hands on it?
So there you have it, ganja lovers. The real power is in a black market existence for our beloved plant. Vote no and stay in control of your market and quality of smoking experience.





October 01, 2012 at 8:41 pm, Chris Weary said:
Sure if you live in California you can get nice organic weed and a normal price, but if you live in new york or anywhere else, you really have no idea what has been done to the weed you smoke. Sometimes shittier weed is sprayed with chemicals to give you a better high so while yes legalization will lend to the commercialization of it, It will be much safer for many more people in this country.
October 01, 2012 at 8:42 pm, Zalman Lekach said:
holy crap I never saw it that way, you make very strong points.
October 01, 2012 at 8:54 pm, Bradley Davis said:
Is this a joke? "I’m not going to get into how many people die working for the cartel every year…" What? I mean yeah, who cares about human life? And what about the journalists speaking out against the cartels who end up beheaded, the innocent bystanders caught up in a drug war they have nothing to do with, the casual smoker whose life is destroyed by a possession charge, the destruction of black communities and families as an inordinate number of them are targeted by drug laws? Do they count? "…tobacco production, which we can safely assume will be mimicked for marijuana" What? Why can we safely assume that? Marijuana legalization is only on the ballot of a couple of states, and commerce clause touting drug warriors would never allow the interstate sale or importation of cannabis crops. Which kind of hobbles any effort towards the industrialization of marijuana for years until this whole mess gets sorted out, if ever at all. "…legalization of marijuana will translate into harsher penalties for independent marijuana growers and distributors…" What? Why? Independent and local growers are going to have a head start if and when any of these measures pass. It seems to me a more analogous business model would be craft distillers, which do just fine on the same shelf as corporate liquor brands.
October 01, 2012 at 9:06 pm, Andrew Poitras said:
The reason why we aren't going to get into the cartels and deaths that are a direct result of cartel activity is because the legalization of marijuana would never stop the cartels. Marijuana is a very, very small portion of their business and they would continue to traffic cocaine, opiates, and a number of other illicites regardless of marijuana legalization. Second, we never said this was on the ballot, we said IF it were we would vote no. Next, independent growers will only have a 'head start' if they have relationships with the government already. And lastly, on an almost unrelated note, craft distillers often have to fight hand over fist for shelf space against corporate liquor brands.
October 01, 2012 at 9:15 pm, Bradley Davis said:
You miss the point of the impact calculus. Cartels would surely survive, without marijuana sales, but then so would more people everywhere. Current policy is killing private citizens and journalists in Mexico, and it's jailing people here. It's these drug policies that are enabling our prison industrial complex, by sending non-violent offenders to serve out meaningless pot possession and distribution sentences. These people's lives count, and you should consider them. This is a real issue, this is on the ballot for Washington, Colorado, and Oregon this year. In a couple of months one of those states could be the first to legalize marijuana. Independent farmers will have a head start because the commerce clause would prevent any farmer from sending any marijuana across state lines. Hardly an ideal market situation for industrialized marijuana operations to flourish. I cede you that last point, they do work hard, and hopefully we can all work to show our support to them for doing so.
October 01, 2012 at 9:52 pm, Andrew Poitras said:
Very great point and thoughtful reply. Thank you.
October 01, 2012 at 8:56 pm, Hieu Lam said:
Uhmm no. I kinda like how alcohol has evolved after the repeal of prohibition. I believe weed will go the same way.
October 01, 2012 at 8:59 pm, Jeremy Arthur Vandelay said:
This is some of the dumbest shit Ive read on this issue.
Addictive additives from corporations? What the fuck do you think the drug dealers put in their weed you dumb shit? never heard of it being laced w heroin or ángel dust?
SEcondly- the "combustion" of cannabis / tobacco? It doesnt combust, moron, it burns. and the act orador is utterly victimless. the argument that cartel violence makes it not so retrata the entire argument against legalization!
Christ this so dumb. I almost feel more dumb after having read it.
October 01, 2012 at 9:11 pm, Andrew Poitras said:
Hi Jeremy. Thank you for your feedback. Here is the definition of the word combustion:
com·bus·tion/kəmˈbəsCHən/
Noun:
The process of burning something: "the combustion of fossil fuels".
October 01, 2012 at 9:01 pm, Erich Nehls said:
No matter how you want to vote on the issue, it will NEVER be legalized Nationally until the government can criminalize the public for something as profitable. By that I mean what other means of public control can the prison system make money on? You find that answer, and you'll see pot for sale at Wal-Mart.
October 01, 2012 at 10:02 pm, Judah Melton said:
While I agree with your assessment of what Big Tobacco type companies would do to marijuana, you or your friends or your local head shop who are all also purists who likely still be growing and taking correct care with their plants and strains, etc. If you would be buying the additive filled "Marlboro Lights" of pot, well that's your own fault.
October 01, 2012 at 10:44 pm, Corrie Coffey said:
Don't legalize, decriminalize. Don't give the government control of the product, but keep people out of jail for stupid little things like smoking a damn joint.
October 02, 2012 at 1:58 am, Ben Sercombe said:
Alex, believe it or not marijuana accounts for 40% of total drug profits reaped by cartels in areas such as Guatemala and Mexico. The trafficking and crime surrounding the trafficking of marijuana as well as other narcotics by these cartels has accounted for over 55,000 deaths in Mexico alone. Legalization of marijuana in the United States would not end the drug war, but it woud severely cripple these violent organization and open up an international debate about legalization and alternative ways to peacefully end the war on drugs.
Drug enforcement fills are jails with people who commit non-violent crimes and also disproportionally affects people of color. The criminalization of the drug has ruined future employment opportunities, families, and peoples' lives in the United States.
I'm sorry if legalization would make pot totally mainstream and therefore not cool anymore, but this is just a tad bit bigger than looking hip.
October 02, 2012 at 8:42 am, Chris O'Hara said:
This all article is one huge lie…….the writer is uniformed moron trying to sound the way people think cannabis users talk………this isn't even close……..the article is a farce and the athuor is a white christain republican.
October 02, 2012 at 4:44 pm, Michael Shepard said:
Bacon donuts promote cannibalism! End the prohibition end the violence.
October 03, 2012 at 12:12 am, Elena Schwartz said:
shut the fuck up.
October 03, 2012 at 12:13 am, Elena Schwartz said:
sorry, that wasn't pointed at the comments, just the douchebag that wrote the article and needs a serious fact checker. this article just totally pissed me off.
October 09, 2012 at 3:05 pm, Marijuana helps ease muscle pain in Multiple Sclerosis patients | Death and Taxes said:
[...] to get their cannabis from independent distributors (dealers) or pharmaceutical companies is a legitimate concern. Marijuana’s medical benefits would position it as a great product for small businesses. But [...]
October 09, 2012 at 4:10 pm, Marijuana helps ease muscle pain in Multiple Sclerosis patients … | Multiple Sclerosis - MSConnections.org - MS Symtoms & MS Information said:
[...] to get their cannabis from independent distributors (dealers) or pharmaceutical companies is a legitimate concern. Marijuana’s medical benefits would position it as a great product for small businesses. But with [...]