News

Can BitCoin, the First Open Source Currency, Threaten the Dollar?

It’s been called “the most dangerous technological project since the internet itself.”  Can the BitCoin give power back to the people?

In the book “Mythmakers & Lawbreakers” edited by Magpie Kiljoy, Alan Moore is interviewed and makes a very profound point.  The writer was paraphrasing a professor at the London School of Economics, and stated the following:

“[The lecturer] was saying that the only reason that governments are governments is that they control the currency; they don’t actually do anything for us that we don’t pay for, other than expose us to the threat of foreign wars by their reckless actions. They don’t actually really even govern us; all they do is control the currency and rake off the proceeds.”

Now, I’d certainly been aware of our government’s currency power creating problems for people in a system which they had never had a hand in creating or to which they had willingly agreed in the first place, quite contrary to Thomas Jefferson’s vision of a government that would dissolve and reconstitute every few decades.  But, it wasn’t until reading the Moore interview that a crystallization occurred, and I began to wonder if currency was perhaps the best way to neutralize a government’s power.

The initial thought had been that this solution could be arrived at by encouraging people to engage in black markets, which many billions do worldwide already.  Not effective enough.  Then it occurred to me that someone must create an alternate currency through which individuals can disengage from their country’s currency, thereby bypassing violent insurrection.

This is essentially what the creators of BitCoin have done with the introduction of their open source digital currency, controlled by each user, kept on one’s computer and impervious to hacks and manipulation, including the inflation that occurs when governments flood countries with newly-minted currency.

Not only does the BitCoin already have practical value—for users are already exchanging them via the internet—but it has struck a symbolic blow against states everywhere, even in its very early stages.

What are the defining characteristics of a BitCoin?  They cannot be tracked or frozen, for one thing.  They cannot be taxed, which would remove yet another source of power the state has over individuals.  The power of the state essentially lies in its taxation powers, which allows it to wage war and allow for modern empire, as well as dispense that taxpayer money to other countries.  BitCoin exchanges can be done anywhere in the world and fees are extremely minimal compared to similar exchanges within and across banks.

BitCoins have already been used to purchase books, video games and other items.  Of course, since the BitCoins can’t be tracked, it opens up a wealth of exploitable opportunity for black markets such as drug dealing and prostitution.  This alone will alarm politicians, who one can imagine are already considering making the new currency illegal.  The same thing could be said of CraigsList, however, and yet it is still legal.

How does one generate BitCoins?  This is where things get interesting and slightly confusing to the not-so-tech savvy.  Each computer can act as a BitCoin miner.  The computer “mines” BitCoins at a predictable rate, which requires time and energy (processing power, electricity and anywhere from 5 to 10 years), and then the fully mined BitCoins are stored locally on the computer.  The risk being that computer theft or computer crashes will erase BitCoin files, leaving users BitCoin-less.  It seems likely, however, that there will be ways of backing up BitCoin accounts.

One of the most fantastic aspects of BitCoin is that it is open source software, which means that one wouldn’t have to buy the software, but simply download it.  Open source has long been a dream of many hackers going back to the creation of home computers and the internet, and has taken on renewed vigor as corporations and governments have gradually consolidated power over computer software and the internet.

The catch with BitCoin is that there will be a limit to the number of BitCoins ultimately generated.  According to a Launch Conference article, only 21 million can be generated by 2140, “but at this point the electricity and time it would take to produce a BitCoin is larger than the actual value of a BitCoin (your laptop might take five years to make one batch of 50, and they currently trade at $6.70 per BitCoin).”

This built-in limitation would seem to restrict the BitCoin to the fringes, unless more and more people download the software, and the value of the BitCoin skyrockets.  And since it has limitations, it’s clear that not all human transactions could be done by way of the BitCoin, which would certainly limit its mission to put power back in the hands of people.  Question: would the tech savvy have an advantage in generating BitCoins?  This seems to be what BitCoin Tech Lead Gavin Andreson is intimating when he told Jason Calacanis on “This Week in Start-Ups” that generating BitCoins has become a specialized business.

In the interview, Calacanis gives BitCoin 24 months before it is dismantled by the US government.  And my good friend noted yesterday that it probably won’t take long before it’s somehow infiltrated and subverted by the US government.  Gavin Andresen, in fact, has already been asked to speak about the software to the CIA’s investment arm In-Q-Tel.  Also interesting is the possibility that open source currencies could revolutionize work: power relationships, work days, etc., freeing up humans to enjoy life instead of being tethered to jobs they hate.

Whatever happens, the invention of the BitCoin is a rather seismic event, and might point to the way of the future, in which the people might finally wrest the power that the state and corporations have held over individuals for far too long.

 

  1. May 17, 2011 at 7:44 pm, Guest said:

    All the “generating bitcoins has become a specialized business” bit means is that mining with a positive expected return requires specialized hardware, specifically high-end graphics cards generally used by computer gamers.  The software to allow mining with that hardware is generally available.

    As for the US government angle, I suspect that the CIA is already using BitCoin to pay low-to-mid-level assets, especially in other Western countries (where the infrastructure to use bitcoins for real-world things is right-now the greatest).  The costs associated with offshore bank accounts are impractical for less than mid-six-figure accounts.

    Reply

  2. May 18, 2011 at 12:43 pm, Chris Howie said:

    “They cannot be taxed, which would remove yet another source of power the state has over individuals.”

    This is just plain wrong.  Businesses are required in most countries to keep records of transactions, and those records can be audited for taxation purposes.  Just as you have to pay sales tax when you pay in cash, you may wind up having to pay sales tax when you pay a registered business in Bitcoins.

    Bitcoins are no less traceable than cash in most circumstances — in fact they are MORE traceable than cash.  So just as evading taxes using cash will likely land you in jail, so will evading taxes with Bitcoins.

    Reply

    • May 18, 2011 at 1:29 pm, D. J. said:

       ”Just as you have to pay sales tax when you pay in cash, you may wind up having to pay sales tax when you pay a registered business in Bitcoins.”

      But, that’s not the case yet.  At the moment, it is not taxed.

      I suppose if they’re so very traceable, the black market transactions in Bitcoins will soon collapse, no?

      Reply

      • May 18, 2011 at 1:54 pm, Chris Howie said:

        “But, that’s not the case yet.  At the moment, it is not taxed.”

        Yet.  I am countering the author’s claim that “they *cannot* be taxed” — I am not saying that they are taxed *right now*.

        “I suppose if they’re so very traceable, the black market transactions in Bitcoins will soon collapse, no?”

        The black market collapsing is unlikely; the transaction history of the entire Bitcoin network is known publicly (that’s what the block chain is) but who owns particular addresses may not be known.  If someone compromises their identity when using the black market, their coin sources and destinations could be easily discovered — much more easily than with cash.  But if they do a good job of concealing their identity, they can remain completely anonymous (or actually pseudonymous).

        Note that this is a different case than a business.  Black market vendors are already doing illegal things; they’re not going to register their business.  Legitimate vendors (think Wal-mart) need to keep records to comply with state and federal law.  These records can be audited for taxation purposes.

        So my entire point is that Bitcoin vs. cash in the context of tax evasion really are not that different from each other.  Bitcoin is not some silver bullet that prevents taxation.

        Reply

        • May 18, 2011 at 3:18 pm, D. J. said:

          I’m not sure you really caught the meaning of my article.

          To be short, I never said it was a silver bullet that prevents taxation.  For the time being, it is non-taxed and therefore outside of the domain of government. I’m more interested in the symbolic value of its current existence than in any of the points you raise.

          Reply

          • May 19, 2011 at 11:11 am, Chris Howie said:

            I’m interested in its symbolic value as well.  I use Bitcoin every day, buy things with it… even develop software for it.  And I’d like people to have a correct understanding of how it works, both technically and legally.

            So when I see statements like this: “They cannot be taxed, which would remove yet another source of power the state has over individuals,” I have to step in and say something, as the average reader is going to take that statement to mean that Bitcoin transactions cannot and will never be taxed.  Whether that’s what you meant or not really doesn’t matter, because that’s not how people are going to read that sentence.  Being interested in the symbolic value of Bitcoin doesn’t excuse you from making misleading statements about it.

          • May 19, 2011 at 1:18 pm, D. J. said:

            I didn’t mean to make misleading statements, Chris.

            Tell you what: why don’t you send me information about exactly what it does and does not do.  You could even write up an essay and I’ll freely quote you and you’ll be heard, and then perhaps we’ll all be happy.  

            My email is dj@deathandtaxesmag.com

            Cheers,

            DJ 

          • May 19, 2011 at 1:22 pm, D. J. said:

            My information was based on Jason Calacanis’ interview with Gavin Andresen and Amir Taaki on “This Week in Start-Ups” and a piece he wrote for Launch Conference.

            Is Calacanis getting a reprimand as well?

        • May 19, 2011 at 10:22 am, bob said:

          Bitcoin allows you to create a new public account ‘alias’ for each transaction. Linking all aliases to a particular account, let alone a particular person, is much harder than it sounds.

          Reply

          • May 19, 2011 at 11:25 am, Chris Howie said:

            That is correct, bob, but when someone sends coins to another address from their wallet, the software is going to pick some transactions it previously received and spend them to that address.  That’s important to understand about Bitcoin — you spend *transactions*.  That makes things traceable, to a certain degree.

            That means that by simply sending money to someone else, you may inadvertently link two of your pseudonyms (for that’s what Bitcoin addresses are) together.  Take this transaction, for example, which I selected randomly from the latest block: http://blockexplorer.com/tx/3683f9aec54de6d11a6e54d96e8c7e31e009fe0312b8b28fcc1c17d0ee902376 .  All of the “from” addresses can be assumed to be under the control of the same person or entity, since they were all spent in the same transaction.  If the real identity of the person behind one of those addresses is known by someone, they know that the same person owns the others.

            So, for example, if you got a bunch of Bitcoins from dealing drugs on the Silk Road, and then you pay your rent the next day in Bitcoins, there’s a good chance you’re going to send him some of the coins you received from dealing.  Your landlord now knows who controls all of those addresses.  If law enforcement comes knocking on his door for information, you’re screwed.

            Likewise, if your employer pays you in Bitcoins and you buy drugs with that transaction, law enforcement may be able to work from both ends of the chain of transactions and determine who you and the dealer are.

            I’m not saying you can’t remain mostly anonymous/pseudonymous (I’ve said in a previous post that you can) but you have to know how Bitcoin works and how to avoid accidentally linking your various identities together if you don’t want to be exposed.

          • May 26, 2011 at 11:16 pm, Milosevic D said:

            It’s not more traceable than using P2P to get illegal music, movies, software, etc. but still official government bodies are far from being able to punish the “thieves”.

            I hope BitCoin (or something new based on its idea) will remain far from control of any government not because governments don’t want to control it, but because people won’t let them.

  3. May 18, 2011 at 12:54 pm, Prestia said:

    Just a quick correction: You state that “your laptop might take five years to make one, and they currently trade at $6.70 per BitCoin.” However, BitCoins are created in batches (never more than fifty). So, it would actually take five years to create one BATCH, not one coin. 

    Reply

    • May 18, 2011 at 1:24 pm, D. J. said:

      Yes, I know that it’s 50 coins.  I shall edit it to avoid similar confusion. 

      Reply

      • May 23, 2011 at 10:25 am, Argentinaland said:

        anyway, it’s probabilistic, if you are very lucky you might create a batch in the first minute (odds are you dont). and then odds are you wont create one for 5 years.

        Reply

  4. May 18, 2011 at 4:46 pm, Roger Mag LeSeul-Magazine'Qui said:

    SubversioN !

    Reply

  5. May 18, 2011 at 11:38 pm, john charles webb jr said:

    BIT.COIN HACKER 2 
    now available at warez.dot.orgy  

    Reply

    • May 18, 2011 at 11:43 pm, john charles webb jr said:

      off-shore banking for your bit coins !
       at >>>  row-row-row-your-boat . com 

      receipts upon request .

       

      Reply

      • May 18, 2011 at 11:45 pm, john charles webb jr said:

        BIT COIN polish and storage cases
        now available on eBay 

        Reply

        • May 18, 2011 at 11:47 pm, john charles webb jr said:

          If you get
          fukin’ abducted by extraterrestrials 
          you will need your BIT.COIN VISA

          APPLY TODAY ! 

          Reply

          • May 18, 2011 at 11:53 pm, john charles webb jr said:

            BIT COIN
            batch-extender

            now on-sale for $6.66  

          • May 19, 2011 at 10:25 am, bob said:

            You seem like you’d be interested in our fine penis enlarger. 
            Only 1 bitcoin!

  6. May 19, 2011 at 8:09 pm, Johnp said:

    The government can declare Bitcoins to have no value, so if they are stolen, no crime has been committed.

    Reply

  7. May 21, 2011 at 3:53 pm, Lauren Mack said:

    The bitcoin economy will only work if there are legal venues to spend bitcoin.  The artist saddet is releasing his album “The Empire” for free at http://saddet.com with an option to donate using bitcoin – this is a good first step toward legitimizing the currency. 

    Reply

  8. May 30, 2011 at 8:20 am, Tradertimm said:

    Perhaps this may help you in future articles:

     https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths

    Also, you neglected to mention the reward for ‘mining’ is for processing transactions and enabling the blockchain to be verified and stored, it isn’t a frivolous activity that only benefits the ‘miner’ – it strengthens the network as a whole.

    I look forward to more elaboration on the facts, as I’m sure you’re aware – transformational ideas are rarely accepted on face value before they change the world.

    Reply

  9. June 05, 2011 at 9:43 am, Phoneyid said:

     

    The question is WHO ISSUES THE CURRENCY? The website does
    not address/evades critical question.

    I buy from bitcom who create them out of thin air. Like any
    private ‘federal reserve bank’.

    If they are created out of “donations” then those
    ‘donors’ are presumably share holders, with an elite few expecting profits via
    “low fees”. If “donors” not expecting a profit, then the
    fact STILL remains that those ‘donations’ were 
    created with FIAT CURRENCY or money created out of thin air.

    Money created debt free by a government for it’s own people,
    and then have the gov spend it into circulation and cheap loans for the good of
    it’s own nation is something those that understand who are against centralised
    private banking want.

    Assuming this did ‘take over’,  it would take power away from all nation
    states to issue their own currency of any value.

    It would give us a global centralised money creator, a One
    World Bank/Money Creator. Rothschild would be in orgasmic ecstasy at that
    notion. All nation States would need to go begging to bitcoin for loans. Who’s
    armies will bitcoin send in to foreclose…. XE? formerly BLACKWATER.

    So far, bitcoin have admitted to exchanging currency. ie
    They are “moneychangers”

    Some might say, that Jesus would whip them too, as he did to
    the then moneychangers

    Reply

  10. June 06, 2011 at 11:26 pm, Egofreaky said:

    I disagree with the premise of the article.

    Currency isn’t “how the man keeps control”.
    It’s a promisory note that
    is exchange for goods and labour, taxation is merely a way of getting
    things funded that individuals could not hope to pay for in a capitalist
    system on their own.
    Anyone going to pay for the national road networks? Or hospitals? Or police forces? Rich philanthropists won’t unless there’s a tax break, which they’re not going to need if they’re not being taxed, and regular joes certainly can’t.

    Money is based on the premise that it
    intrinsically held value (gold and silver coinage), and that this was
    easily exchanged for goods and labour. That is until it became to impractical to
    exchange i.e. paying someone 50 gold coins was going to weigh a hell of
    a lot and storage space becomes an issue.
    Hence bank notes which have a
    “face value”. The bank notes themselves are basically a cheque that is
    instantly cashable and exchangeable without the intermediary of a bank. We recognise them as having value, even though they’re just scraps of plastic/paper or chits of metal that if they weren’t in a form we recognise as money would be worth a fraction of a cent as a piece of material.
    You can exchange your slip of paper and chunks of metal for cigarettes and bubblegum anywhere. I don’t see the guy at 7-11 taking BitCoins anytime soon, but they will take cash, credit, cheque and my local guy will even do WoW gold because he’s dodgy and will top up the till from his own pocket later.

    Governments
    release more currency to prevent these promisory notes from
    accumulating too much value individually (deflation) as it means there’s
    less of it to go around, however with 90% of currency now being
    virtually kept simply as bank records, and the majority of transactions
    now being cashless (i.e. EFTPOS) keeping national currency mints running
    is becoming something that may have to be re-examined. Of course, there are always going to be stupid people in government who don’t realise that this is the true function of money and believe that more wealth can be generated by simply printing more. This is what leads to runaway inflation.

    The
    BitCoins have no intrinsic value if they are self generating and aren’t
    directly tied to something that backs them, such as a mineral wealth of a
    Government as gaurantor. This article doesn’t explain how there is any actual value to a BitCoin either, other than that some people value them. Well, that’s the same as pretty much anything else. Should we make POGs are currency? Or Pokemon? People collect and value those as well.
    There’s already numerous virtual currencies that have real world values because they DO have an obvious value and often can be exchanged for goods and services from real world people without requiring the intermediary of any real world currency. World of Warcraft gold is the best example of this. Zynga’s (facebook) credit system is another. Admittedly, these interact with real world currency from time to time as people seek to purchase more in-system currency. Again, the real world interaction between with BitCoins and outside exchange for goods seems unrecognisable.

    If the economy of BitCoins gets shut down,
    it’ll be because it’s looking similar to a ponzi scheme, not because it’s untraceable.
    There are already several ways to make currency untraceable and they
    haven’t been shut down by The Man.
    My personal favourite is paying
    for pre-paid VISA debit cards in cash. Get a $500 one, and pay the $5
    setup fee per card. A 1% fee to get the largest credit institution in
    the world to launder money for me legally? Priceless. (I’m aware that’s
    the other one)

    Reply

Add New Comment

Showing 26 comments
Subscribe by RSS